Wayne Patterson

516 citations
58 papers · 295 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Wayne Patterson

35 papers receiving 204 citations

Peers

Wayne Patterson
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • Cultural Studies 66
  • Computer Science Applications 19
  • Sociology and Political Science 127
  • Demography 28
  • Signal Processing 26
Replace Daniel Klug with:
Daniel Klug United States
T. Meder Netherlands
Jean‐Louis Le Moigne France
Andrew Piper Canada
Sean Lawson United States
Svetlana S. Bodrunova Russia
Retno Winarni Indonesia
Annette Hautli-Janisz Germany
Willard McCarty United Kingdom
Peter Lunenfeld United States
Wayne Patterson relative to Daniel Klug United States Daniel Klug's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×9.4×
Daniel Klug · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Wayne Patterson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Wayne Patterson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Wayne Patterson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wayne Patterson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Wayne Patterson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Wayne Patterson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Wayne Patterson. The network helps show where Wayne Patterson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside Wayne Patterson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Wayne Patterson Line = papers co-authored together Wayne Patterson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 58 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1991119
2 199029
3 198516
4
Mathematical Cryptology for Computer Scientists and Mathematicians
198715
5 198814
6 200211
7 20159
8 20198
9 20198
10 20165
11 20165
12 20114
13 20034
14
Ensuring the Quality of Certificate Programs.
20013
15 19963
16 20113
17 19853
18 20173
19
Koreans in America
19922
20 20232

About Wayne Patterson

Wayne Patterson is a scholar working on Information Systems, Artificial Intelligence, Sociology and Political Science, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition and Cultural Studies, having authored 58 papers that have together received 295 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Information and Cyber Security (11 papers), Chaos-based Image/Signal Encryption (9 papers), Cryptography and Data Security (6 papers), Asian Culture and Media Studies (6 papers), Advanced Malware Detection Techniques (5 papers), Cryptographic Implementations and Security (5 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (4 papers) and Coding theory and cryptography (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cultural Studies (66 citations), Computer Science Applications (19 citations), Sociology and Political Science (127 citations), Demography (28 citations) and Signal Processing (26 citations). Wayne Patterson has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Chile. Frequent co-authors include Roger Daniels, Michael W. Weiner, Mahdi Abdelguerfi, Lorraine Fleming, Mohamed Chouikha, Tepper L. Gill, Talitha Washington, Susanne Wetzel, Burton S. Kaliski and Howard E. Evans. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, IEEE Micro, Journal of Japanese Studies, International Migration Review and Lecture notes in computer science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact