Warwick Newman

513 citations
17 papers · 402 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Warwick Newman

17 papers receiving 344 citations

Peers

Warwick Newman
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
  • Nephrology 91
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 203
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 47
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 50
  • Gastroenterology 24
Replace A. J. Rudolph with:
A. J. Rudolph United States
C.W. De Lannoy United States
Yasushi Nako Japan
Barbara Engelhardt United States
Richard Kates United States
Ute Maurer Austria
Gordon Gladman United Kingdom
Richard W Krouskop United States
Norman B. Hodgson United States
Marilyn M. McDonald United States
Warwick Newman relative to A. J. Rudolph United States A. J. Rudolph's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
A. J. Rudolph · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Warwick Newman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Warwick Newman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Warwick Newman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Warwick Newman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Warwick Newman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Warwick Newman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Warwick Newman. The network helps show where Warwick Newman may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside Warwick Newman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Warwick Newman Line = papers co-authored together Warwick Newman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 197676
2 196964
3 196755
4 196942
5 196741
6 196724
7 196719
8 196915
9 196815
10
The unreliability of a single estimation of fetal scalp blood pH.
197113
11 197110
12 196910
13 19517
14 19874
15 19813
16 19683
17 19581

About Warwick Newman

Warwick Newman is a scholar working on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Nephrology, Obstetrics and Gynecology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 17 papers that have together received 402 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neonatal and fetal brain pathology (4 papers), Neonatal Respiratory Health Research (4 papers), Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments (3 papers), Hyperglycemia and glycemic control in critically ill and hospitalized patients (2 papers), Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (2 papers), Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research (2 papers), Renal function and acid-base balance (2 papers) and Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nephrology (91 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (203 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (47 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (50 citations) and Gastroenterology (24 citations). Warwick Newman has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Carl Wood, Peter Renou, Judith Lumley, Adrian M. Walker, R. S. Ferguson, John Leeton, J. Caulie Gunnells, Ronald P. Krueger, Ralph C. McCoy and James R. Clapp. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Medical Journal of Australia, Medicine, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology and The Lancet.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact