Richard Kates

842 citations
9 papers · 369 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Richard Kates

9 papers receiving 352 citations

Peers

Richard Kates
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 144
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 137
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 76
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 79
  • Nephrology 17
Replace J Dommisse with:
J Dommisse South Africa
D Cianciulli Italy
R.W. Boston Canada
Jack H. McCubbin United States
Dan J. Sherman Israel
A. J. Rudolph United States
Warwick Newman Australia
Kati Tihtonen Finland
G. Mello Italy
Fouron Jc Canada
Richard Kates relative to J Dommisse South Africa J Dommisse's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
J Dommisse · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Richard Kates

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Richard Kates's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard Kates with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard Kates more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Richard Kates

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard Kates. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard Kates. The network helps show where Richard Kates may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside Richard Kates, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Richard Kates Line = papers co-authored together Richard Kates links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#Work
1 1985118
2 1985108
3 197956
4 198729
5 200222
6
RAPID MEASUREMENT OF HEMOGLOBIN A2 BY MEANS OF CELLULOSE ACETATE MEMBRANE ELECTROPHORESIS.
196320
7
Intrapartum uterine rupture in a primiparous patient previously treated for invasive mole.
19947
8 19877
9 19992

About Richard Kates

Richard Kates is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Surgery, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 9 papers that have together received 369 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (3 papers), Uterine Myomas and Treatments (1 paper), Hemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders (1 paper), Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment (1 paper), Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control (1 paper), Ectopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management (1 paper), Erythrocyte Function and Pathophysiology (1 paper) and Gestational Trophoblastic Disease Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (144 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (137 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (76 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (79 citations) and Nephrology (17 citations). Richard Kates has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Thomas J. Benedetti, Virginia P. Williams, T. J. Benedetti, Barry S. Schifrin, Wei Tang, Lesa Nelson, David Donaldson, Kenneth Ward, Rong Mao and Christine E. Miller. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Prenatal Diagnosis, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Annals of Emergency Medicine and Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact