Wanting Wang

705 citations
40 papers · 502 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Wanting Wang

35 papers receiving 498 citations

Peers

Wanting Wang
Comparison fields: 5 of 106
  • Modeling and Simulation 98
  • Numerical Analysis 27
  • Immunology 72
  • Water Science and Technology 41
  • Applied Mathematics 31
Replace Linrui Li with:
Linrui Li China
Shubo Chen China
Chenxue Yang China
Jingzhong Liu China
Qiying Wang Australia
Fan Bu China
Chunlong Sun China
Shawn Garbett United States
Wanting Wang relative to Linrui Li China Linrui Li's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Linrui Li · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Wanting Wang

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Wanting Wang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Wanting Wang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wanting Wang more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Wanting Wang

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Wanting Wang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Wanting Wang. The network helps show where Wanting Wang may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Wanting Wang, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Wanting Wang Line = papers co-authored together Wanting Wang links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201983
2 202463
3 201858
4 202142
5 201931
6 202428
7 202028
8 202126
9 202224
10 202221
11 202114
12 20249
13 20247
14 20246
15 20216
16 20246
17 20235
18 20255
19 20255
20 20244

About Wanting Wang

Wanting Wang is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Oncology, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment, Immunology and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 40 papers that have together received 502 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include CAR-T cell therapy research (5 papers), Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques (4 papers), Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies (3 papers), Perovskite Materials and Applications (3 papers), Advanced battery technologies research (3 papers), Supramolecular Chemistry and Complexes (2 papers), Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials (2 papers) and Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Modeling and Simulation (98 citations), Numerical Analysis (27 citations), Immunology (72 citations), Water Science and Technology (41 citations) and Applied Mathematics (31 citations). Wanting Wang has collaborated with scholars based in China, Hong Kong and United States. Frequent co-authors include Muhammad Altaf Khan, Xue Cao, Tony N. Marion, Yu Cao, Yanwei Cheng, Yuwei Pan, Guangyu Wu, Yizhen Zhang, Jin Li and Quan Cheng. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Immunology, Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, Separation and Purification Technology, Nature Communications and Chaos Solitons & Fractals.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact