W.A. Stoop

1.3k citations
27 papers · 1.1k · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

W.A. Stoop

26 papers receiving 931 citations

Peers

W.A. Stoop
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 263
  • Soil Science 286
  • Plant Science 702
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 342
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 153
Replace Diane Rickerl with:
Diane Rickerl United States
H. Ssali Uganda
Franklin Mairura Kenya
M. L. Jat India
M. A. Foale Australia
Francis Shaxson United Kingdom
U.K. Behera India
Jeroen Huising Kenya
D.M. Jansen Netherlands
Rabah Lahmar France
W.A. Stoop relative to Diane Rickerl United States Diane Rickerl's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Diane Rickerl · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by W.A. Stoop

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of W.A. Stoop's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by W.A. Stoop with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites W.A. Stoop more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by W.A. Stoop

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by W.A. Stoop. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by W.A. Stoop. The network helps show where W.A. Stoop may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside W.A. Stoop, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with W.A. Stoop Line = papers co-authored together W.A. Stoop links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2002415
2 201197
3 199066
4 200964
5 200459
6 200859
7 201554
8 201142
9 199638
10 198628
11 201625
12 198523
13 198723
14
A strategy to raise the productivity of subsistence farming systems in the west African semi-arid tropics.
198220
15 198315
16 198015
17 200512
18 198711
19 201710
20
NARS linkages in technology generation and technology transfer
19887

About W.A. Stoop

W.A. Stoop is a scholar working on Plant Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Agronomy and Crop Science, Forestry and General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, having authored 27 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Rice Cultivation and Yield Improvement (9 papers), Agriculture and Rural Development Research (7 papers), Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems (6 papers), Plant responses to water stress (5 papers), Agricultural Systems and Practices (4 papers), Clay minerals and soil interactions (3 papers), Agricultural Innovations and Practices (3 papers) and GABA and Rice Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (263 citations), Soil Science (286 citations), Plant Science (702 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (342 citations) and Agronomy and Crop Science (153 citations). W.A. Stoop has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Amir Kassam, Norman Uphoff, L.O. Fresco, Tim Hart, Peter J. Matlon, T. Defoer, C. Shambu Prasad and A. K. Thakur. Their work appears in journals such as Field Crops Research, Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, Geoderma, Agricultural Systems and International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact