W. T. Singleton

53 papers receiving 598 citations

Peers

W. T. Singleton
Comparison fields: 5 of 136
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 155
  • Medical Laboratory Technology 25
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 96
  • Social Psychology 255
  • Human-Computer Interaction 44
Replace David C. Nagel with:
David C. Nagel United States
V. David Hopkin Czechia
Yvette J. Tenney United States
Richard E. Christ United States
Stephen Dixon United States
Esa M. Rantanen United States
Dina Burkolter Germany
Randall J. Mumaw United States
Kevin B. Bennett United States
Eric Min‐yang Wang Taiwan
W. T. Singleton relative to David C. Nagel United States David C. Nagel's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
David C. Nagel · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by W. T. Singleton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of W. T. Singleton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by W. T. Singleton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites W. T. Singleton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by W. T. Singleton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by W. T. Singleton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by W. T. Singleton. The network helps show where W. T. Singleton may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside W. T. Singleton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with W. T. Singleton Line = papers co-authored together W. T. Singleton links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 61 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Man-machine systems
1974246
2
Measurement of Man at Work
197145
3
Risk and decisions
198742
4 197841
5
The mind at work
198929
6 198925
7 198025
8
The Body at Work: Biological Ergonomics
198325
9 197322
10 195418
11 197217
12 196715
13 196914
14 198212
15 202211
16 197111
17 196510
18 196710
19 20229
20 19607

About W. T. Singleton

W. T. Singleton is a scholar working on Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, Biomedical Engineering, Social Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, having authored 61 papers that have together received 745 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Occupational Health and Safety Research (6 papers), Ergonomics and Human Factors (5 papers), Risk and Safety Analysis (4 papers), Human-Automation Interaction and Safety (3 papers), Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes (3 papers), Usability and User Interface Design (3 papers), Advanced Neural Network Applications (2 papers) and Machine Learning and ELM (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (155 citations), Medical Laboratory Technology (25 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (96 citations), Social Psychology (255 citations) and Human-Computer Interaction (44 citations). W. T. Singleton has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Jan Fredrik Hovden, Wilson Lowrey, K. F. H. MURRELL, David Whitfield, Holly Roy, Raúl Bescós, Ewen McColl, Peter C. Whitfield, Zoë Brookes and Mohamed El‐Sharkawy. Their work appears in journals such as Ergonomics, Applied Ergonomics, Nature, Journal of Dentistry and Journal of Media Business Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact