W. Mark Ford

4.9k citations
179 papers · 3.6k · h-index 35

Impact in

Papers in

W. Mark Ford

169 papers receiving 3.2k citations

Peers

W. Mark Ford
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
  • Developmental Biology 523
  • Ecological Modeling 608
  • Ecology 2.5k
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 1.7k
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 882
Replace Bradley Law with:
Bradley Law Australia
Leonardo Ancillotto Italy
Frank Adriaensen Belgium
Jeff Bowman Canada
Eyal Shochat United States
W. Douglas Robinson United States
R. Mark Brigham Canada
Therese M. Donovan United States
Justin A. Welbergen Australia
M. Zachariah Peery United States
W. Mark Ford relative to Bradley Law Australia Bradley Law's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Bradley Law · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by W. Mark Ford

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of W. Mark Ford's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by W. Mark Ford with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites W. Mark Ford more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by W. Mark Ford

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by W. Mark Ford. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by W. Mark Ford. The network helps show where W. Mark Ford may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside W. Mark Ford, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with W. Mark Ford Line = papers co-authored together W. Mark Ford links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 179 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005144
2 2005141
3 1999116
4 199587
5 200485
6 201181
7 200277
8 200673
9 200369
10 201665
11 200253
12 201451
13 200151
14 200849
15 200049
16 200548
17 200248
18 199946
19 200145
20 200945

About W. Mark Ford

W. Mark Ford is a scholar working on Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Ecological Modeling, having authored 179 papers that have together received 3.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bat Biology and Ecology Studies (72 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (66 papers), Rangeland and Wildlife Management (54 papers), Fire effects on ecosystems (44 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (33 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (25 papers), Marine animal studies overview (17 papers) and Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies (14 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Biology (523 citations), Ecological Modeling (608 citations), Ecology (2.5k citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (1.7k citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (882 citations). W. Mark Ford has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Malawi and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Michael Menzel, John W. Edwards, Jennifer M. Menzel, Steven B. Castleberry, Karl V. Miller, Petra Bohall Wood, Brian R. Chapman, Jane L. Rodrigue, John C. Kilgo and Alexander Silvis. Their work appears in journals such as Forest Ecology and Management, Journal of Wildlife Management, PLoS ONE, Ecosphere and Fire Ecology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact