W. Joss

1.6k citations
98 papers · 1.3k · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

W. Joss

94 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

W. Joss
Comparison fields: 5 of 33
  • Condensed Matter Physics 828
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 578
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 652
  • Geophysics 81
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 43
Replace T. Dahm with:
T. Dahm Germany
K. Gloos Germany
S. N. Artëmenko Russia
David J. Baar Canada
G. W. Crabtree United States
A. I. Smirnov Russia
C. Attanasio Italy
C. M. Muirhead United Kingdom
Dong Ho Wu United States
E. M. Forgan United Kingdom
W. Joss relative to T. Dahm Germany T. Dahm's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
T. Dahm · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by W. Joss

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of W. Joss's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by W. Joss with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites W. Joss more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by W. Joss

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by W. Joss. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by W. Joss. The network helps show where W. Joss may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside W. Joss, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with W. Joss Line = papers co-authored together W. Joss links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 98 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1991146
2 1990135
3 198789
4 198986
5 199660
6 199559
7 198533
8 199130
9 200523
10 201121
11 198921
12 198820
13 198720
14 198818
15 200518
16 199316
17 199516
18 198016
19 198416
20 199115

About W. Joss

W. Joss is a scholar working on Condensed Matter Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Biomedical Engineering and Electrical and Electronic Engineering, having authored 98 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (32 papers), Rare-earth and actinide compounds (31 papers), Organic and Molecular Conductors Research (24 papers), Quantum and electron transport phenomena (17 papers), Superconducting Materials and Applications (16 papers), Iron-based superconductors research (15 papers), Magnetism in coordination complexes (13 papers) and Magnetic properties of thin films (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Condensed Matter Physics (828 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (578 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (652 citations), Geophysics (81 citations) and Nuclear and High Energy Physics (43 citations). W. Joss has collaborated with scholars based in France, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include G. W. Crabtree, G. Martinez, V. B. Timofeev, K. Ploog, H. Buhmann, И. В. Кукушкин, A. S. Plaut, K. von Klitzing, A. G. M. Jansen and W. Biberacher. Their work appears in journals such as Physica B Condensed Matter, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity, Physical review. B, Condensed matter, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials and Solid State Communications.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact