W. Hauff

870 citations
26 papers · 521 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

W. Hauff

25 papers receiving 504 citations

Peers

W. Hauff
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 302
  • Parasitology 59
  • Ophthalmology 52
  • Oncology 137
  • Neurology 71
Replace Inès Chelly with:
Inès Chelly Tunisia
Jean Pierre Farcet France
Atsushi Azumi Japan
Poonam Elhence India
Bruce L. Johnson United States
M. Ahmed United States
Stephen C. Foster United States
Jo‐Ann W. Andriko United States
Joseph B. Michelson United States
Y Pinaudeau France
W. Hauff relative to Inès Chelly Tunisia Inès Chelly's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.4×
Inès Chelly · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by W. Hauff

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of W. Hauff's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by W. Hauff with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites W. Hauff more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by W. Hauff

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by W. Hauff. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by W. Hauff. The network helps show where W. Hauff may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside W. Hauff, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with W. Hauff Line = papers co-authored together W. Hauff links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006128
2 200777
3 200173
4 200649
5 200945
6 200841
7 200822
8 200521
9
Orbital scintigraphy with the somatostatin receptor tracer 99mTc-P829 in patients with Graves' disease.
200315
10 200412
11 20047
12 19995
13
[Combined therapy with cyclosporin A and cortisone in endocrine Basedow endocrine orbitopathy: successful use in compressive optic neuropathy].
19934
14
[Biometry--an exact method for the measurement of the axial length of the eye].
19834
15 19853
16 19822
17
[Idiopathic sclero-choroid calcification].
19992
18 19842
19 19992
20 19852

About W. Hauff

W. Hauff is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Rheumatology and Genetics, having authored 26 papers that have together received 521 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (5 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (4 papers), Intraocular Surgery and Lenses (4 papers), Ocular Oncology and Treatments (4 papers), Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders (3 papers), Retinal and Macular Surgery (3 papers), Corneal surgery and disorders (3 papers) and Dermatological and Skeletal Disorders (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (302 citations), Parasitology (59 citations), Ophthalmology (52 citations), Oncology (137 citations) and Neurology (71 citations). W. Hauff has collaborated with scholars based in Austria, Germany and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Andreas Chott, Markus Raderer, Berthold Streubel, Marlene Troch, Stefan Wöhrer, Michael Formanek, Cathrin Skrabs, Leonhard Müllauer, Talin Barisani‐Asenbauer and S. Maca. Their work appears in journals such as Acta Ophthalmologica, Journal of Clinical Oncology, European Journal of Radiology, Annals of Oncology and Leukemia.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact