Marlene Troch

30 papers receiving 792 citations

Peers

Marlene Troch
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 626
  • Genetics 149
  • Oncology 296
  • Neurology 124
  • Gastroenterology 30
Replace Hirotaka Takasaki with:
Hirotaka Takasaki Japan
M. Hoffmann Austria
Pin‐Pen Hsieh Taiwan
Patrizia Albertini Italy
Ellen Chase United States
Eva Cristóbal Spain
H. Ye United Kingdom
Evert-Jan G. Boerma Netherlands
Simone Snijder Netherlands
E. Januszewicz Australia
Marlene Troch relative to Hirotaka Takasaki Japan Hirotaka Takasaki's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Hirotaka Takasaki · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Marlene Troch

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Marlene Troch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Marlene Troch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Marlene Troch more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Marlene Troch

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Marlene Troch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Marlene Troch. The network helps show where Marlene Troch may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Marlene Troch, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Marlene Troch Line = papers co-authored together Marlene Troch links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006133
2 200778
3 201267
4 201058
5
Does MALT lymphoma of the lung require immediate treatment? An analysis of 11 untreated cases with long-term follow-up.
200754
6 200947
7 200641
8 200840
9 201434
10 201230
11 200724
12 201023
13 200822
14 201017
15 200716
16 201515
17 199514
18 201114
19
Assessment of the prognostic indices IPI and FLIPI in patients with mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma.
201014
20 201114

About Marlene Troch

Marlene Troch is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Genetics, Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Oncology, having authored 32 papers that have together received 813 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (20 papers), Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research (8 papers), Viral-associated cancers and disorders (4 papers), CNS Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (3 papers), Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations (2 papers), Thyroid Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (2 papers), Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes (2 papers) and Colorectal and Anal Carcinomas (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (626 citations), Genetics (149 citations), Oncology (296 citations), Neurology (124 citations) and Gastroenterology (30 citations). Marlene Troch has collaborated with scholars based in Austria, Germany and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Markus Raderer, Andreas Chott, Leonhard Müllauer, Berthold Streubel, Stefan Wöhrer, Barbara Kiesewetter, Michael Formanek, W. Hauff, Martha Hoffmann and Karl Turetschek. Their work appears in journals such as Haematologica, Annals of Hematology, Annals of Oncology, Transfusion and Current Hematologic Malignancy Reports.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact