W. Frech

1.8k citations
45 papers · 1.5k · h-index 23

Impact in

Papers in

W. Frech

45 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

W. Frech
Comparison fields: 5 of 122
  • Analytical Chemistry 563
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 715
  • Electrochemistry 217
  • Pollution 211
  • Complementary and Manual Therapy 34
Replace Anders Cedergren with:
Anders Cedergren Sweden
Peter Schramel Germany
P. Brätter Germany
Stephen G Capar United States
P. Ostapczuk Germany
Marjan Veber Slovenia
Helen M. Crews United Kingdom
John T. Creed United States
Beatrice Campanella Italy
Fred L. Fricke United States
W. Frech relative to Anders Cedergren Sweden Anders Cedergren's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
Anders Cedergren · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by W. Frech

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of W. Frech's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by W. Frech with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites W. Frech more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by W. Frech

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by W. Frech. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by W. Frech. The network helps show where W. Frech may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside W. Frech, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with W. Frech Line = papers co-authored together W. Frech links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 45 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1986167
2 1984139
3 1996137
4
2001103
5 200293
6 199189
7 198251
8 198245
9 199344
10 200140
11 199238
12 198735
13 200033
14 199033
15 200131
16 199128
17
Evaluation of some critical factors affecting determination of aluminum in blood, plasma, or serum by electrothermal atomic absorption spectroscopy.
198227
18 198327
19 198627
20 200827

About W. Frech

W. Frech is a scholar working on Analytical Chemistry, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Spectroscopy, Plant Science and Computational Mechanics, having authored 45 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Analytical chemistry methods development (18 papers), Heavy Metal Exposure and Toxicity (9 papers), Mercury impact and mitigation studies (8 papers), Aluminum toxicity and tolerance in plants and animals (8 papers), Electrochemical Analysis and Applications (7 papers), Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (7 papers), Trace Elements in Health (5 papers) and Ion-surface interactions and analysis (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Analytical Chemistry (563 citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (715 citations), Electrochemistry (217 citations), Pollution (211 citations) and Complementary and Manual Therapy (34 citations). W. Frech has collaborated with scholars based in Sweden, Germany and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Douglas C. Baxter, Anders Cedergren, Premysl Slanina, Johanna Qvarnström, Ewa Bulska, Erik Lundberg, Lars‐Gösta Ekström, Stuart A. Slorach, Lars Lambertsson and S. Jönsson. Their work appears in journals such as Spectrochimica Acta Part B Atomic Spectroscopy, Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Analytica Chimica Acta and Pure and Applied Chemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact