W. D. Sager

30 papers receiving 215 citations

Peers

W. D. Sager
Comparison fields: 5 of 39
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 99
  • Neurology 74
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 51
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 44
  • Rehabilitation 11
Replace Lionel Kowal with:
Lionel Kowal Australia
Virendra R. Desai United States
Shibu Pillai India
R. Andrew Danks Australia
Serhat Baydın Türkiye
Ronald B. David United States
Raeburn C. Llewellyn United States
Hesselink United States
J. L. Steven Italy
Øivind Gjertsen Norway
W. D. Sager relative to Lionel Kowal Australia Lionel Kowal's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.5×
Lionel Kowal · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by W. D. Sager

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of W. D. Sager's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by W. D. Sager with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites W. D. Sager more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by W. D. Sager

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by W. D. Sager. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by W. D. Sager. The network helps show where W. D. Sager may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside W. D. Sager, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with W. D. Sager Line = papers co-authored together W. D. Sager links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198177
2 198148
3 198117
4 197916
5 198213
6 19798
7 19787
8 19826
9 19786
10
[Endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreaticography (ERCP) and computer tomography in the diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis, pseudocysts and carcinoma of the pancreas--a comparison (author's transl)].
19805
11 19815
12 20084
13 19824
14 19783
15 19823
16 20082
17 19792
18 20082
19 19811
20 19771

About W. D. Sager

W. D. Sager is a scholar working on Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Epidemiology, Neurology and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 33 papers that have together received 240 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases (6 papers), Acute Ischemic Stroke Management (5 papers), Head and Neck Surgical Oncology (4 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances (3 papers), Meningioma and schwannoma management (3 papers), Epilepsy research and treatment (2 papers), Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (2 papers) and EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (99 citations), Neurology (74 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (51 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (44 citations) and Rehabilitation (11 citations). W. D. Sager has collaborated with scholars based in Austria, Germany and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include G. Ladurner, G. Pfurtscheller, L. M. Auer, Helmut Lechner, B. Gallhofer, Ch. Urban, H. Lechner, L. D. Iliff, P. W. Ascher and G. H. du Boulay. Their work appears in journals such as RöFo - Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Röntgenstrahlen und der bildgebenden Verfahren, Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography, European Journal of Pediatrics, Neuroradiology and Journal of neurosurgery.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact