W. C. Smith
Impact in
- Small Animals top 1%
- Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
- Agronomy and Crop Science top 2%
- Bioenergy crop production and management
Papers in
-
- Animal Nutrition and Physiology 24
- Meat and Animal Product Quality 9
-
- Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies 16
- Co-authors
- C. Wayne Smith (1 shared paper)R. A. Frederiksen (1 shared paper)Hugh Tunstall‐Pedoe (4 shared papers)Padam Simkhada (2 shared papers)Sean Semple (2 shared papers)Om Kurmi (2 shared papers)Jon G. Ayres (2 shared papers)Simon Chapman (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Animal Science (15 papers)New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research (6 papers)Leprosy Review (5 papers)The Lancet (3 papers)Crop Science (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomNew ZealandUnited States
In The Last Decade
W. C. Smith
59 papers receiving 2.6k citations
W. C. Smith's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 163
- Small Animals 247
- Agronomy and Crop Science 350
- Animal Science and Zoology 330
- Biochemistry 120
- Pollution 201
Countries citing papers authored by W. C. Smith
This map shows the geographic impact of W. C. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by W. C. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites W. C. Smith more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by W. C. Smith
This network shows the impact of papers produced by W. C. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by W. C. Smith. The network helps show where W. C. Smith may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside W. C. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 60 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sorghum: origin, history, technology and production. Hit paper breakdown → | 2000 | 594 |
| 2 | 2010 | 345 | |
| 3 | 2004 | 179 | |
| 4 | 1990 | 174 | |
| 5 | 1993 | 164 | |
| 6 | 1991 | 160 | |
| 7 | 2007 | 80 | |
| 8 | 2007 | 76 | |
| 9 | 1987 | 72 | |
| 10 | 2011 | 71 | |
| 11 | 1996 | 60 | |
| 12 | 2006 | 59 | |
| 13 | 1984 | 53 | |
| 14 | 2011 | 48 | |
| 15 | 2014 | 46 | |
| 16 | 1990 | 44 | |
| 17 | 2009 | 37 | |
| 18 | 1986 | 34 | |
| 19 | 1989 | 34 | |
| 20 | 1988 | 31 |
About W. C. Smith
W. C. Smith is a scholar working on Animal Science and Zoology, Small Animals, Infectious Diseases, Genetics and Surgery, having authored 60 papers that have together received 2.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Animal Nutrition and Physiology (24 papers), Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (16 papers), Leprosy Research and Treatment (10 papers), Meat and Animal Product Quality (9 papers), Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (8 papers), Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins (3 papers), Research in Cotton Cultivation (3 papers) and Smoking Behavior and Cessation (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Small Animals (247 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (350 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (330 citations), Biochemistry (120 citations) and Pollution (201 citations). W. C. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, New Zealand and United States. Frequent co-authors include C. Wayne Smith, R. A. Frederiksen, Hugh Tunstall‐Pedoe, Padam Simkhada, Sean Semple, Om Kurmi, Jon G. Ayres, Simon Chapman, G.D.O. Lowe and G. Pearson. Their work appears in journals such as Animal Science, New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research, Leprosy Review, The Lancet and Crop Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.