W. Böcker

182 papers receiving 4.8k citations

Peers

W. Böcker
Comparison fields: 5 of 137
  • Cancer Research 783
  • Oncology 1.1k
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 613
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 625
  • Dermatology 303
Replace Heinz Baisch with:
Heinz Baisch Germany
Carla Di Loreto Italy
Mario A. Anzano United States
Zenya Naito Japan
Tetsunari Oyama Japan
José Manuel Lopes Portugal
Yusuke Kobayashi Japan
Vincent A. Memoli United States
Edward B. Leof United States
A Hittmair Austria
W. Böcker relative to Heinz Baisch Germany Heinz Baisch's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.3×
Heinz Baisch · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by W. Böcker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of W. Böcker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by W. Böcker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites W. Böcker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by W. Böcker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by W. Böcker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by W. Böcker. The network helps show where W. Böcker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside W. Böcker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with W. Böcker Line = papers co-authored together W. Böcker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 192 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1986249
2 2002228
3 2010211
4 1997176
5 1988158
6 2002140
7 1998136
8 1995119
9 1988111
10
Cytogenetic analysis of multifocal bladder cancer supports a monoclonal origin and intraepithelial spread of tumor cells.
2001106
11
Expression of endothelin-1, endothelin-A, and endothelin-B receptor in human breast cancer and correlation with long-term follow-up.
2003105
12 1992103
13 1993102
14 200496
15 199388
16 201782
17 199181
18 199279
19 199777
20 198469

About W. Böcker

W. Böcker is a scholar working on Oncology, Cancer Research, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Surgery, having authored 192 papers that have together received 5.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Thyroid Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (22 papers), Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (17 papers), Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (16 papers), Cancer and Skin Lesions (16 papers), Salivary Gland Tumors Diagnosis and Treatment (12 papers), Cancer-related Molecular Pathways (11 papers), Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment (11 papers) and Cancer Cells and Metastasis (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cancer Research (783 citations), Oncology (1.1k citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (613 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (625 citations) and Dermatology (303 citations). W. Böcker has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Austria and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Igor Buchwalow, Sören Schröder, Barbara Dockhorn‐Dworniczak, Kurt Werner Schmid, Horst Bürger, Christopher Poremba, Dietmar Öfner, Martin Tötsch, Raihanatou Ina Diallo and Lothar Hertle. Their work appears in journals such as Histopathology, Archiv für Pathologische Anatomie und Physiologie und für Klinische Medicin, The Journal of Pathology, International Journal of Oncology and Der Unfallchirurg.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact