Virginia E. Duncan

15 papers receiving 392 citations

Peers

Virginia E. Duncan
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • Oncology 170
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 62
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 66
  • Forestry 13
  • Cancer Research 43
Replace Anindita Roy with:
Anindita Roy United Kingdom
Amanda J. Oliver United Kingdom
Stefanie Reinhardt Germany
Tommy Gerdes Denmark
Giulia Occhipinti Italy
Kenji Murata Japan
Raphaël Helaers Belgium
Josane F. Sousa Brazil
Sadie Johnson United States
Virginia E. Duncan relative to Anindita Roy United Kingdom Anindita Roy's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.5×
Anindita Roy · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Virginia E. Duncan

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Virginia E. Duncan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Virginia E. Duncan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Virginia E. Duncan more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Virginia E. Duncan

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Virginia E. Duncan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Virginia E. Duncan. The network helps show where Virginia E. Duncan may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Virginia E. Duncan, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Virginia E. Duncan Line = papers co-authored together Virginia E. Duncan links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 2019137
2 200065
3 200963
4 200654
5 202229
6 199912
7 200011
8 20168
9 20167
10 20166
11
Cellular delivery is a major obstacle for oligodeoxynucleotide inhibition of telomerase activity.
19995
12 20232
13 20192
14 20151
15 20181
16 20240
17 20220

About Virginia E. Duncan

Virginia E. Duncan is a scholar working on Surgery, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Oncology and Molecular Biology, having authored 17 papers that have together received 403 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (2 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (2 papers), Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (2 papers), Fire effects on ecosystems (2 papers), Neonatal Respiratory Health Research (2 papers), Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment (1 paper), Autopsy Techniques and Outcomes (1 paper) and Protein Degradation and Inhibitors (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Oncology (170 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (62 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (66 citations), Forestry (13 citations) and Cancer Research (43 citations). Virginia E. Duncan has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include R. Scot Duncan, Nirag Jhala, Vishnu Reddy, David C. Chhieng, Darshana Jhala, Damon B. Bowe, Hannah Brakke, Olivia Finney, Michael C. Jensen and Juliane Gust. Their work appears in journals such as Pediatric and Developmental Pathology, Biotropica, Annals of Neurology, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Acta Paediatrica.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact