Vini Nagaraj

14 papers receiving 419 citations

Peers

Vini Nagaraj
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 26
  • Surgery 145
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 56
  • Developmental Neuroscience 13
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 11
Replace Sechiko Suga with:
Sechiko Suga Japan
Kirstin Reinecke Germany
T. N. Rasmussen Denmark
Takeshi Shimada Japan
Takeshi Onoue Japan
Janette Tenne-Brown Australia
Jennifer M. Rojas United States
Etienne Cartier United States
Olga E. Redina Russia
Cindy Moore United States
Vini Nagaraj relative to Sechiko Suga Japan Sechiko Suga's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.8×
Sechiko Suga · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Vini Nagaraj

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Vini Nagaraj's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Vini Nagaraj with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Vini Nagaraj more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Vini Nagaraj

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Vini Nagaraj. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Vini Nagaraj. The network helps show where Vini Nagaraj may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Vini Nagaraj, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Vini Nagaraj Line = papers co-authored together Vini Nagaraj links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 2009215
2 201457
3 201241
4 202133
5 202328
6 201618
7 201316
8 20206
9 20155
10 20224
11 20222
12 20222
13
CART is a novel glucose-dependent peptide with antidiabetic actions in humans
20151
14 20241

About Vini Nagaraj

Vini Nagaraj is a scholar working on Surgery, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Genetics, Developmental Neuroscience and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 14 papers that have together received 429 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pancreatic function and diabetes (6 papers), Diabetes and associated disorders (4 papers), Spinal Cord Injury Research (4 papers), Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (3 papers), Nerve injury and regeneration (2 papers), Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress and Disease (2 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (1 paper) and Hyperglycemia and glycemic control in critically ill and hospitalized patients (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (26 citations), Surgery (145 citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (56 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (13 citations) and Behavioral Neuroscience (11 citations). Vini Nagaraj has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Sweden and China. Frequent co-authors include Erik Renström, Thomas Reinbothe, Anders H. Rosengren, Daiqing Li, Leif Groop, Jonatan Tuncel, Holger Luthman, Albert Salehi, Ramūnas Jokubka and Patrik Rorsman. Their work appears in journals such as Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, International Journal of Molecular Sciences, Cell Metabolism, PLoS ONE and Biomedicines.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact