Victoria Spring
Impact in
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
- Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
- Eating Disorders and Behaviors
- Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
Papers in
-
- Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment 7
- Free Will and Agency 1
-
- Emotions and Moral Behavior 2
- Co-authors
- C. Daryl Cameron (5 shared papers)Cynthia M. Bulik (1 shared paper)Mina Cikara (2 shared papers)Jill Portnoy (1 shared paper)Olivia Choy (1 shared paper)Annis Lai Chu Fung (1 shared paper)Adrian Raine (1 shared paper)Andrew R. Todd (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Trends in Cognitive Sciences (2 papers)Eating Behaviors (1 paper)Clinical Psychological Science (1 paper)Emotion (1 paper)Aggressive Behavior (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomHong Kong
In The Last Decade
Victoria Spring
10 papers receiving 295 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
- Clinical Psychology 174
- Social Psychology 89
- Applied Psychology 19
- Behavioral Neuroscience 12
- Cognitive Neuroscience 65
Countries citing papers authored by Victoria Spring
This map shows the geographic impact of Victoria Spring's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Victoria Spring with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Victoria Spring more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Victoria Spring
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Victoria Spring. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Victoria Spring. The network helps show where Victoria Spring may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 16 scholars most cited alongside Victoria Spring, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2014 | 78 | |
| 2 | 2013 | 65 | |
| 3 | 2018 | 56 | |
| 4 | 2013 | 48 | |
| 5 | 2017 | 30 | |
| 6 | 2018 | 18 | |
| 7 | 2018 | 4 | |
| 8 | 2018 | 3 | |
| 9 | 2018 | 2 | |
| 10 | Outrage helps, outrage hurts: How moral outrage predicts help and punishment behavior | 2020 | 1 |
| 11 | 2022 | 0 |
About Victoria Spring
Victoria Spring is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Psychiatry and Mental health and Clinical Psychology, having authored 11 papers that have together received 305 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (7 papers), Empathy and Medical Education (3 papers), Emotions and Moral Behavior (2 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (2 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (1 paper), Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (1 paper), Free Will and Agency (1 paper) and Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (174 citations), Social Psychology (89 citations), Applied Psychology (19 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (12 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (65 citations). Victoria Spring has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Hong Kong. Frequent co-authors include C. Daryl Cameron, Cynthia M. Bulik, Mina Cikara, Jill Portnoy, Olivia Choy, Annis Lai Chu Fung, Adrian Raine, Andrew R. Todd, Eleanor K. Hanna and Megan Puzia. Their work appears in journals such as Trends in Cognitive Sciences, Eating Behaviors, Clinical Psychological Science, Emotion and Aggressive Behavior.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.