Victoria E. White

26 papers receiving 575 citations

Peers

Victoria E. White
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
  • Horticulture 21
  • General Psychology 18
  • Social Psychology 237
  • Clinical Psychology 211
  • Insect Science 77
Replace Ram Dass with:
Ram Dass India
Jillian Fish United States
Robert L. Haynes United States
George M. Batsche United States
Manny Sternlicht Israel
Eric M. Hansen Sweden
J. R. Brethour United States
Thomas Lewis United Kingdom
Alan D. Bowd Canada
Kathleen P. Allen United States
Victoria E. White relative to Ram Dass India Ram Dass's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.1×
Ram Dass · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Victoria E. White

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Victoria E. White's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Victoria E. White with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Victoria E. White more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Victoria E. White

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Victoria E. White. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Victoria E. White. The network helps show where Victoria E. White may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Victoria E. White, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Victoria E. White Line = papers co-authored together Victoria E. White links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2002131
2 201278
3 200169
4 200363
5 199839
6
Passing notes: The use of therapeutic letter writing in counseling adolescents.
200232
7 201230
8 200228
9 200324
10
Developing Counseling Objectives and Empowering Clients: A Strength-Based Intervention.
200223
11 201222
12 200320
13 200120
14 199617
15 200013
16 198512
17 201311
18 20005
19 19905
20 20025

About Victoria E. White

Victoria E. White is a scholar working on Insect Science, Clinical Psychology, Plant Science, Genetics and Social Psychology, having authored 26 papers that have together received 659 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (6 papers), Insect Pheromone Research and Control (4 papers), Advances in Cucurbitaceae Research (4 papers), Counseling Practices and Supervision (3 papers), Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics (3 papers), Gun Ownership and Violence Research (2 papers), Hemiptera Insect Studies (2 papers) and Insect behavior and control techniques (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Horticulture (21 citations), General Psychology (18 citations), Social Psychology (237 citations), Clinical Psychology (211 citations) and Insect Science (77 citations). Victoria E. White has collaborated with scholars based in United States, New Zealand and India. Frequent co-authors include Thomas J. Sweeney, Jane E. Myers, Paul A. Schutz, Christopher J. Knowles, Melissa Murray, Cecilia McGregor, Steven J. Knapp, Eleni Bachlava, J.T.S. Walker and J.G. Charles. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, Journal of Educational Psychology, Counselor Education and Supervision, Journal of College Student Retention Research Theory & Practice and Journal of The Electrochemical Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact