Verena Geist

548 citations
42 papers · 363 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Verena Geist

39 papers receiving 346 citations

Peers

Verena Geist
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
  • Management Information Systems 176
  • Software 57
  • Information Systems 156
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 58
  • Health Informatics 7
Replace Aiswarya Raj with:
Aiswarya Raj India
István Dávid Canada
Richard Mordinyi Austria
Anna Maria Vollmer Germany
Dnyanesh Rajpathak United States
Andrey Sadovykh Russia
Alexandra Mazak Austria
Michael K. Painter United States
Diego Pérez-Palacín Italy
Aurelijus Morkevičius Lithuania
Verena Geist relative to Aiswarya Raj India Aiswarya Raj's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Aiswarya Raj · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Verena Geist

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Verena Geist's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Verena Geist with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Verena Geist more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Verena Geist

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Verena Geist. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Verena Geist. The network helps show where Verena Geist may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside Verena Geist, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Verena Geist Line = papers co-authored together Verena Geist links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 42 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201996
2 201440
3 202037
4 201420
5 202013
6 201412
7 201611
8 200911
9 202010
10 20109
11 20138
12 20128
13 20157
14
Optional Activities in Process Flows.
20126
15 20206
16 20126
17 20236
18 20166
19 20165
20 20155

About Verena Geist

Verena Geist is a scholar working on Management Information Systems, Information Systems, Artificial Intelligence, Computer Networks and Communications and Software, having authored 42 papers that have together received 363 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Business Process Modeling and Analysis (30 papers), Service-Oriented Architecture and Web Services (19 papers), Semantic Web and Ontologies (9 papers), Software Engineering Research (7 papers), Model-Driven Software Engineering Techniques (6 papers), Advanced Database Systems and Queries (5 papers), Data Quality and Management (5 papers) and Software System Performance and Reliability (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management Information Systems (176 citations), Software (57 citations), Information Systems (156 citations), Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (58 citations) and Health Informatics (7 citations). Verena Geist has collaborated with scholars based in Austria and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Alexandra Mazak, Manuel Wimmer, Dirk Draheim, Klaus‐Dieter Schewe, Lisa Ehrlinger, Werner Zellinger, Rudolf Ramler, Lukas Fischer, David James Brunner and M. Moser. Their work appears in journals such as Software Practice and Experience, Business Process Management Journal, Information Systems, IEEE Software and IEEE Access.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact