Stochastic Processes in Physics and Chemistry1992 · 2.5k citations
What are hit papers?
Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if any of the following hold:
it has ≥500 total citations;
it reaches ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (the
threshold is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it);
it reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.
This map shows the geographic impact of Van Kampen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Van Kampen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Van Kampen more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Van Kampen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Van Kampen. The network helps show where Van Kampen may publish in the future.
Van Kampen is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Infectious Diseases, Organic Chemistry, Surgery and Communication, having authored 2 papers that have together received 2.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (903 citations), Modeling and Simulation (127 citations), Condensed Matter Physics (274 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (547 citations) and Mathematical Physics (120 citations). Their work appears in journals such as ProQuest LLC eBooks.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.