V. Thämer

65 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Peers

V. Thämer
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 906
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 251
  • Developmental Neuroscience 45
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 328
  • Physiology 45
Replace Franz Kehl with:
Franz Kehl Germany
Paul A. Murray United States
Enis Novalija United States
OLE JACOB BROCH Germany
Anna Stadnicka United States
Neil E. Farber United States
Anna K. Hsu United States
Leo G. Kevin United States
Detlef Obal United States
Masahisa Hirakawa Japan
V. Thämer relative to Franz Kehl Germany Franz Kehl's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Franz Kehl · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by V. Thämer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of V. Thämer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by V. Thämer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites V. Thämer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by V. Thämer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by V. Thämer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by V. Thämer. The network helps show where V. Thämer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside V. Thämer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with V. Thämer Line = papers co-authored together V. Thämer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 66 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1984143
2 2002137
3 1985123
4 1998121
5 2001110
6 200095
7 199894
8 200171
9 199369
10 199965
11 199759
12 199747
13 200347
14 199642
15 199842
16 198537
17 200234
18 200133
19 200129
20 198526

About V. Thämer

V. Thämer is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Surgery and Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, having authored 66 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac Ischemia and Reperfusion (41 papers), Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (11 papers), Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control (10 papers), Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics (9 papers), Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects (7 papers), Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors (6 papers), Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (4 papers) and Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (906 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (251 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (45 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (328 citations) and Physiology (45 citations). V. Thämer has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Wolfgang S Schlack, Benedikt Preckel, Gerd Heusch, Jost Müllenheim, Andreas Deußen, Dirk Ebel, Jochen D. Schipke, Detlef Obal, Thomas B. Comfere and Jan Fräßdorf. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Anaesthesia, Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology, Basic Research in Cardiology, Anesthesia & Analgesia and Pflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact