V. Thämer

61 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Peers

V. Thämer
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Developmental Neuroscience 476
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 896
  • Emergency Medicine 307
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 155
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 614
Replace Franz Kehl with:
Franz Kehl Germany
Enis Novalija United States
Detlef Obal United States
Leo G. Kevin United States
Neil E. Farber United States
Zeljko J. Bosnjak United States
Lynda M. Ludwig United States
Jost Müllenheim Germany
Leslie A. Newberg United States
Donna M. Van Winkle United States
V. Thämer relative to Franz Kehl Germany Franz Kehl's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Franz Kehl · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by V. Thämer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of V. Thämer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by V. Thämer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites V. Thämer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by V. Thämer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by V. Thämer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by V. Thämer. The network helps show where V. Thämer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside V. Thämer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with V. Thämer Line = papers co-authored together V. Thämer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 63 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1984140
2 2002136
3 1985121
4 1998119
5 2001111
6 199896
7 200094
8 200172
9 199369
10 199961
11 199758
12 199748
13 200347
14 199644
15 199842
16 198539
17 200233
18 200131
19 200131
20 199927

About V. Thämer

V. Thämer is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Emergency Medicine and Developmental Neuroscience, having authored 63 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac Ischemia and Reperfusion (29 papers), Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (16 papers), Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (12 papers), Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (11 papers), Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research (10 papers), Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control (6 papers), Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (6 papers) and Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Neuroscience (476 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (896 citations), Emergency Medicine (307 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (155 citations) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (614 citations). V. Thämer has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include W. Schlack, Benedikt Preckel, Gerd Heusch, Jost Müllenheim, Andreas Deußen, D. Ebel, Jochen D. Schipke, Detlef Obal, Thomas B. Comfere and Jan Fräßdorf. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology, British Journal of Anaesthesia, Anesthesia & Analgesia, Pflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology and Basic Research in Cardiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact