V. Thämer

2.2k citations
62 papers · 1.7k · h-index 22

Impact in

Papers in

V. Thämer

61 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers

V. Thämer
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Developmental Neuroscience 697
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 952
  • Emergency Medicine 499
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 220
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 730
Replace Franz Kehl with:
Franz Kehl Germany
Enis Novalija United States
Detlef Obal United States
Jost Müllenheim Germany
Zeljko J. Bosnjak United States
Leo G. Kevin United States
Lynda M. Ludwig United States
Anna Stadnicka United States
Neil E. Farber United States
Donna M. Van Winkle United States
V. Thämer relative to Franz Kehl Germany Franz Kehl's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Franz Kehl · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by V. Thämer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of V. Thämer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by V. Thämer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites V. Thämer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by V. Thämer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by V. Thämer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by V. Thämer. The network helps show where V. Thämer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside V. Thämer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with V. Thämer Line = papers co-authored together V. Thämer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 62 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2002132
2 1984123
3 1998116
4 1985113
5 2001106
6 199892
7 200091
8 200170
9 199362
10 199959
11 199751
12 200347
13 199743
14 199640
15 199838
16 198535
17 200230
18 200129
19 200128
20 199925

About V. Thämer

V. Thämer is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Emergency Medicine and Developmental Neuroscience, having authored 62 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac Ischemia and Reperfusion (32 papers), Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (20 papers), Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (18 papers), Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research (16 papers), Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (13 papers), Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (7 papers), Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control (7 papers) and Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Neuroscience (697 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (952 citations), Emergency Medicine (499 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (220 citations) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (730 citations). V. Thämer has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United Kingdom and France. Frequent co-authors include W. Schlack, Benedikt Preckel, Gerd Heusch, Jost Müllenheim, Andreas Deußen, D. Ebel, Detlef Obal, Jochen D. Schipke, Thomas B. Comfere and Jan Fräßdorf. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology, British Journal of Anaesthesia, Anesthesia & Analgesia, Pflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology and Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact