Up Lim

617 citations
35 papers · 419 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

    • Regional Economics and Spatial Analysis 9
    • Economic Growth and Productivity 5
    • Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth 4
    • Spatial and Panel Data Analysis 4
    • Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies 6
    • Place Attachment and Urban Studies 3

Up Lim

32 papers receiving 384 citations

Peers

Up Lim
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
  • Business and International Management 24
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 50
  • Transportation 48
  • Economics and Econometrics 169
  • Urban Studies 28
Replace Hebe Verrest with:
Hebe Verrest Netherlands
William L. Swann United States
Wanxia Zhao China
Margaret Cowell United States
Rubén Garrido‐Yserte Spain
Marianna Markantoni United Kingdom
Jacqueline Borel-Saladin South Africa
Sebastian Fastenrath Australia
Jan Ženka Czechia
Sandra Valencia Sweden
Up Lim relative to Hebe Verrest Netherlands Hebe Verrest's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Hebe Verrest · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Up Lim

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Up Lim's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Up Lim with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Up Lim more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Up Lim

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Up Lim. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Up Lim. The network helps show where Up Lim may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 6 scholars most cited alongside Up Lim, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Up Lim Line = papers co-authored together Up Lim links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201678
2 201757
3 200752
4 201745
5 200333
6 201121
7 201619
8 201814
9 200413
10 200812
11 201512
12 20078
13 20157
14 20196
15 20226
16 20175
17 20244
18 20154
19 20162
20 20082

About Up Lim

Up Lim is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Sociology and Political Science, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis and Urban Studies, having authored 35 papers that have together received 419 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Regional Economics and Spatial Analysis (9 papers), Korean Urban and Social Studies (7 papers), Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies (6 papers), Economic Growth and Productivity (5 papers), Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (4 papers), Spatial and Panel Data Analysis (4 papers), Place Attachment and Urban Studies (3 papers) and Urbanization and City Planning (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Business and International Management (24 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (50 citations), Transportation (48 citations), Economics and Econometrics (169 citations) and Urban Studies (28 citations). Up Lim has collaborated with scholars based in South Korea and United States. Frequent co-authors include Donghyun Kim, George Galster, Jackie Cutsinger, Minyoung Kim, Ki-Chan Nam and Jinhee Kim. Their work appears in journals such as Sustainability, The Annals of Regional Science, Cities, ˜The œjournal of regional analysis & policy and Environment and Planning A Economy and Space.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact