Up Lim

653 citations
37 papers · 456 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Up Lim

33 papers receiving 421 citations

Peers

Up Lim
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
  • Business and International Management 26
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 55
  • Transportation 49
  • Economics and Econometrics 173
  • Urban Studies 31
Replace William L. Swann with:
William L. Swann United States
Wanxia Zhao China
Marianna Markantoni United Kingdom
Jiska de Groot South Africa
Rubén Garrido Yserte Spain
Sandra C. Valencia Sweden
Tüzin Baycan Levent Türkiye
Sebastian Fastenrath Australia
Guofeng Wang China
Jacqueline Borel-Saladin South Africa
Up Lim relative to William L. Swann United States William L. Swann's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×17×
William L. Swann · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Up Lim

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Up Lim's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Up Lim with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Up Lim more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Up Lim

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Up Lim. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Up Lim. The network helps show where Up Lim may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 7 scholars most cited alongside Up Lim, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Up Lim Line = papers co-authored together Up Lim links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201690
2 201767
3 200752
4 201746
5 200332
6 201123
7 201621
8 200414
9 201814
10 201513
11 200812
12 202210
13 20157
14 20197
15 20247
16 20077
17 20174
18 20154
19 20163
20 20153

About Up Lim

Up Lim is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Urban Studies, Sociology and Political Science and Transportation, having authored 37 papers that have together received 456 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Regional Economics and Spatial Analysis (9 papers), Korean Urban and Social Studies (7 papers), Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies (6 papers), Economic Growth and Productivity (5 papers), Urbanization and City Planning (4 papers), Spatial and Panel Data Analysis (4 papers), Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (4 papers) and Place Attachment and Urban Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Business and International Management (26 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (55 citations), Transportation (49 citations), Economics and Econometrics (173 citations) and Urban Studies (31 citations). Up Lim has collaborated with scholars based in South Korea and United States. Frequent co-authors include Donghyun Kim, George Galster, Jackie Cutsinger, Minyoung Kim, Sangyun Jeong, Jinhee Kim and Ki-Chan Nam. Their work appears in journals such as Sustainability, The Annals of Regional Science, Urban Studies, Cities and Sustainable Cities and Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact