Ümit Beden

473 citations
32 papers · 362 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Ümit Beden

30 papers receiving 348 citations

Peers

Ümit Beden
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
  • Ophthalmology 82
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 131
  • Dermatology 37
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 48
  • Neurology 32
Replace Aysel Pelit with:
Aysel Pelit Türkiye
Mohammad Bagher Rajabi Iran
Hatem A. Tawfik Egypt
Alicia Galindo‐Ferreiro Spain
Ana M. S. Morley United Kingdom
İsmet Durak Türkiye
E. Gutiérrez-Díaz Spain
Neil G. Dreizen United States
Randall L. Beatty United States
Sachiko Noda Japan
Ümit Beden relative to Aysel Pelit Türkiye Aysel Pelit's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.6×
Aysel Pelit · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ümit Beden

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ümit Beden's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ümit Beden with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ümit Beden more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ümit Beden

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ümit Beden. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ümit Beden. The network helps show where Ümit Beden may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ümit Beden, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ümit Beden Line = papers co-authored together Ümit Beden links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200343
2 200831
3 200923
4 200723
5 201420
6 200518
7 201216
8 201016
9 200515
10 200815
11 201314
12 200714
13 201011
14 200711
15 200611
16
Tear secretion and ferning patterns among premature and full-term newborns.
200811
17 201110
18 201310
19 20088
20
Screening for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) in the middle Black Sea region of Turkey.
20127

About Ümit Beden

Ümit Beden is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Dermatology, Surgery and Neurology, having authored 32 papers that have together received 362 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Corneal Surgery and Treatments (4 papers), Facial Rejuvenation and Surgery Techniques (4 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (3 papers), Retinopathy of Prematurity Studies (3 papers), Ocular Surface and Contact Lens (3 papers), Ocular Diseases and Behçet’s Syndrome (3 papers), Neonatal Health and Biochemistry (2 papers) and Traumatic Ocular and Foreign Body Injuries (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (82 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (131 citations), Dermatology (37 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (48 citations) and Neurology (32 citations). Ümit Beden has collaborated with scholars based in Türkiye, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Barış Sönmez, Dilek Erkan, Mete Edizer, Yüksel Süllü, Mehmet Orhan, Murat İrkeç, Dıclehan Orhan, Muzaffer Elmalı, Yurdanur Süllü and Nurşen Arıtürk. Their work appears in journals such as Ophthalmic surgery, lasers & imaging retina, European Journal of Ophthalmology, Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Ocular Immunology and Inflammation and Eye & Contact Lens Science & Clinical Practice.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact