Vikas Chadha

709 citations
35 papers · 431 · h-index 11

Impact in

    • Ocular Oncology and Treatments
    • Intraocular Surgery and Lenses
    • Glaucoma and retinal disorders
    • Ocular Infections and Treatments
    • Facial Rejuvenation and Surgery Techniques

Papers in

Vikas Chadha

28 papers receiving 409 citations

Peers

Vikas Chadha
Comparison fields: 5 of 50
  • Ophthalmology 230
  • Dermatology 65
  • Urology 18
  • Internal Medicine 8
  • Health Informatics 3
Replace Geoff Wilcsek with:
Geoff Wilcsek Australia
Nachum Rosen Israel
Bahram Eshraghi Iran
Ian C. Francis Australia
Gabriela M. Espinoza United States
Alexander Poon Australia
Hadi Ghadimi Iran
Eng‐Yiat Yap Singapore
Nasser Karimi Iran
Oluyemi Fasina Nigeria
Vikas Chadha relative to Geoff Wilcsek Australia Geoff Wilcsek's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Geoff Wilcsek · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Vikas Chadha

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Vikas Chadha's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Vikas Chadha with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Vikas Chadha more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Vikas Chadha

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Vikas Chadha. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Vikas Chadha. The network helps show where Vikas Chadha may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Vikas Chadha, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Vikas Chadha Line = papers co-authored together Vikas Chadha links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201094
2 200675
3 200854
4 200647
5 201522
6 200918
7 202117
8 202016
9 201712
10 201912
11 200610
12 20197
13 20227
14 20215
15 20085
16 20214
17 20064
18 20233
19 20113
20 20223

About Vikas Chadha

Vikas Chadha is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Dermatology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 35 papers that have together received 431 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ocular Oncology and Treatments (11 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (6 papers), Intraocular Surgery and Lenses (4 papers), Menopause: Health Impacts and Treatments (2 papers), Retinal and Macular Surgery (2 papers), Facial Rejuvenation and Surgery Techniques (2 papers), Ocular Disorders and Treatments (2 papers) and Ultrasound Imaging and Elastography (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (230 citations), Dermatology (65 citations), Urology (18 citations), Internal Medicine (8 citations) and Health Informatics (3 citations). Vikas Chadha has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Mexico and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Ewan Kemp, David Lockington, Heather Russell, Shyamanga Borooah, Adrian Tey, Caroline Styles, Jaswinder Singh, Roshini Sanders, Suparno Chakrabarti and Caroline Cobb. Their work appears in journals such as Eye, British Journal of Ophthalmology, Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Menopause The Journal of The North American Menopause Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact