U. Dieter

28 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

U. Dieter
Comparison fields: 5 of 118
  • Statistics and Probability 169
  • Numerical Analysis 98
  • Algebra and Number Theory 79
  • Epidemiology 339
  • Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics 35
Replace Robert Azencott with:
Robert Azencott United States
Alessandro Rinaldo United States
Karl Zeller Germany
Arthur Albert United States
George M. Ewing United States
R. F. Churchhouse United Kingdom
R.R. Mohler United States
Henry Hermes United States
J. E. Yukich United States
V. P. Chistyakov Russia
U. Dieter relative to Robert Azencott United States Robert Azencott's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×16.3×
Robert Azencott · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by U. Dieter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of U. Dieter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by U. Dieter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites U. Dieter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by U. Dieter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by U. Dieter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by U. Dieter. The network helps show where U. Dieter may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 6 scholars most cited alongside U. Dieter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with U. Dieter Line = papers co-authored together U. Dieter links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2003498
2 1974215
3 197291
4 198275
5 198255
6 197345
7 197044
8 197544
9 198040
10 196629
11 198424
12 197123
13 198920
14 198819
15 195719
16 197118
17 198318
18 195916
19 198515
20 198214

About U. Dieter

U. Dieter is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Signal Processing, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Numerical Analysis and Algebra and Number Theory, having authored 31 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bayesian Methods and Mixture Models (7 papers), Algorithms and Data Compression (5 papers), Mathematical Approximation and Integration (3 papers), Analytic Number Theory Research (3 papers), Scientific Research and Discoveries (3 papers), Blind Source Separation Techniques (3 papers), Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms (2 papers) and Advanced Mathematical Identities (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Statistics and Probability (169 citations), Numerical Analysis (98 citations), Algebra and Number Theory (79 citations), Epidemiology (339 citations) and Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics (35 citations). U. Dieter has collaborated with scholars based in Austria, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Joachim Ahrens, A Gächter, Karl Stoffel, Gwidon Stachowiak, Markus S. Kuster and Georg Ch. Pflug. Their work appears in journals such as Computing, Mathematics of Computation, ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software, Communications of the ACM and Journal für die reine und angewandte Mathematik (Crelles Journal).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact