Tyler E. Greenlee

522 citations
37 papers · 302 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Tyler E. Greenlee

36 papers receiving 295 citations

Peers

Tyler E. Greenlee
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
  • Ophthalmology 198
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 76
  • Health Informatics 3
  • Transportation 10
  • Neurology 11
Replace Ai Kido with:
Ai Kido Japan
Xinran Dong China
Xiaolei Sun China
Reetika Sharma India
Ki Bang Uhm South Korea
Yuki Mori Japan
Gordana Sunaric‐Mégevand Switzerland
D Chiseliţă Romania
Hee Yoon Cho South Korea
Sanj Wickremasinghe United Kingdom
Tyler E. Greenlee relative to Ai Kido Japan Ai Kido's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.7×
Ai Kido · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Tyler E. Greenlee

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tyler E. Greenlee's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tyler E. Greenlee with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tyler E. Greenlee more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tyler E. Greenlee

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tyler E. Greenlee. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tyler E. Greenlee. The network helps show where Tyler E. Greenlee may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Tyler E. Greenlee, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Tyler E. Greenlee Line = papers co-authored together Tyler E. Greenlee links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202137
2 202035
3 202029
4 202021
5 202019
6 202119
7
Amylase isoenzymes in the evaluation of trauma patients.
198417
8 202014
9 202014
10 197713
11 202111
12 20207
13 20217
14 20206
15 20225
16 20215
17 20214
18 20204
19 20194
20 20214

About Tyler E. Greenlee

Tyler E. Greenlee is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Control and Systems Engineering, Surgery and General Health Professions, having authored 37 papers that have together received 302 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Retinal Diseases and Treatments (18 papers), Retinal Imaging and Analysis (10 papers), Retinal and Optic Conditions (6 papers), Drug-Induced Ocular Toxicity (2 papers), Retinal and Macular Surgery (2 papers), Optical Coherence Tomography Applications (2 papers), Ocular Diseases and Behçet’s Syndrome (2 papers) and Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (198 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (76 citations), Health Informatics (3 citations), Transportation (10 citations) and Neurology (11 citations). Tyler E. Greenlee has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include Rishi P. Singh, Thais F. Conti, Grant L. Hom, Isaac Briskin, Nisha Malhotra, Justin C. Muste, Weilin Song, Ram Ram, Kieran C. Murphy and Katherine E. Talcott. Their work appears in journals such as Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Ophthalmic surgery, lasers & imaging retina, Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology, Ophthalmology Retina and American Journal of Ophthalmology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact