Tsang‐Wei Tu

976 citations
26 papers · 714 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Tsang‐Wei Tu

25 papers receiving 712 citations

Peers

Tsang‐Wei Tu
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 435
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 76
  • Neurology 131
  • Computational Mathematics 5
  • Neurology 61
Replace Elias Kellner with:
Elias Kellner Germany
Russell Ouellette Sweden
Richard L. Yates United Kingdom
Simona Schiavi Italy
Kristina Szabo Germany
Ayşe Tuba Karagülle Kendi United States
John Grinstead United States
Gabriel Mangeat Canada
Béatrice Benedetti Italy
Shelly I. Shiran Israel
Tsang‐Wei Tu relative to Elias Kellner Germany Elias Kellner's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Elias Kellner · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Tsang‐Wei Tu

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tsang‐Wei Tu's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tsang‐Wei Tu with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tsang‐Wei Tu more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tsang‐Wei Tu

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tsang‐Wei Tu. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tsang‐Wei Tu. The network helps show where Tsang‐Wei Tu may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Tsang‐Wei Tu, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Tsang‐Wei Tu Line = papers co-authored together Tsang‐Wei Tu links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011312
2 201677
3 201858
4 201947
5 200924
6 201324
7 200923
8 201419
9 201318
10 201618
11 201714
12 201812
13 202010
14 20179
15 20139
16 20098
17 20148
18 20208
19 20205
20 20223

About Tsang‐Wei Tu

Tsang‐Wei Tu is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Biomedical Engineering, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Molecular Biology, having authored 26 papers that have together received 714 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (12 papers), Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (6 papers), Ultrasound and Hyperthermia Applications (5 papers), Spinal Cord Injury Research (4 papers), Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders (3 papers), Spinal Dysraphism and Malformations (3 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances (3 papers) and Mesenchymal stem cell research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (435 citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (76 citations), Neurology (131 citations), Computational Mathematics (5 citations) and Neurology (61 citations). Tsang‐Wei Tu has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Taiwan and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Sheng‐Kwei Song, Joseph A. Frank, Kathryn Trinkaus, Mingqiang Xie, Anne H. Cross, Justin P. Haldar, Yong Wang, Qing Wang, Peng Sun and Fang‐Cheng Yeh. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neurotrauma, NMR in Biomedicine, Scientific Reports, The Annals of Thoracic Surgery and Cell Reports Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact