Torsten Röhl

11 papers receiving 686 citations

Peers

Torsten Röhl
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
  • Safety Research 355
  • General Decision Sciences 36
  • Sociology and Political Science 496
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 126
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 90
Replace Daisuke Nakanishi with:
Daisuke Nakanishi Japan
Hannelore De Silva Austria
Peter D. Sozou United Kingdom
Wataru Toyokawa Japan
Rahul Bhui United States
Rory Smead United States
Áron Székely Italy
Hannelore Brandt Austria
Julia Poncela-Casasnovas Spain
Cédric Perret United Kingdom
Torsten Röhl relative to Daisuke Nakanishi Japan Daisuke Nakanishi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.3×
Daisuke Nakanishi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Torsten Röhl

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Torsten Röhl's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Torsten Röhl with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Torsten Röhl more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Torsten Röhl

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Torsten Röhl. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Torsten Röhl. The network helps show where Torsten Röhl may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside Torsten Röhl, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Torsten Röhl Line = papers co-authored together Torsten Röhl links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1 2013130
2 2012130
3 200389
4 201482
5 201177
6 201373
7 200452
8 201251
9 200711
10 20082
11 20071

About Torsten Röhl

Torsten Röhl is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Safety Research, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Genetics and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 11 papers that have together received 698 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (6 papers), Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (6 papers), Evolution and Genetic Dynamics (4 papers), Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence (3 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (2 papers), Advanced Memory and Neural Computing (1 paper), Neural Networks and Applications (1 paper) and Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Safety Research (355 citations), General Decision Sciences (36 citations), Sociology and Political Science (496 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (126 citations) and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (90 citations). Torsten Röhl has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Manfred Milinski, Arne Traulsen, Jochem Marotzke, Christian Hilbe, Stefan Bornholdt, Kristin Hagel, Jennifer Jacquet, Christoph Hauert, Heinz Georg Schuster and Dirk Semmann. Their work appears in journals such as Nature Communications, Physical Review Letters, Nature Climate Change, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact