Ton Otto
Impact in
- Museology top 1%
- Crafts, Textile, and Design
-
- Pacific and Southeast Asian Studies
- Geographies of human-animal interactions
Papers in
- Anthropology 18
- Anthropological Studies and Insights 14
-
- Participatory Visual Research Methods 4
- Co-authors
- Rachel Charlotte Smith (3 shared papers)Wendy Gunn (1 shared paper)Rane Willerslev (2 shared papers)Nicholas Thomas (1 shared paper)Heike Winschiers‐Theophilus (1 shared paper)Rosita Henry (2 shared papers)Michael Wood (1 shared paper)H.G.G.M. Driessen (1 shared paper)
In The Last Decade
Ton Otto
46 papers receiving 584 citations
Ton Otto's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
- Museology 92
- Geography, Planning and Development 132
- Human-Computer Interaction 115
- Anthropology 195
- Demography 113
Countries citing papers authored by Ton Otto
This map shows the geographic impact of Ton Otto's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ton Otto with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ton Otto more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ton Otto
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ton Otto. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ton Otto. The network helps show where Ton Otto may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 15 scholars most cited alongside Ton Otto, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 51 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Design Anthropology : Theory and Practice Hit paper breakdown → | 2013 | 230 |
| 2 | 2008 | 85 | |
| 3 | 1998 | 50 | |
| 4 | 2013 | 38 | |
| 5 | Tradition and agency : tracing cultural continuity and invention / | 2005 | 31 |
| 6 | 2023 | 29 | |
| 7 | 1992 | 23 | |
| 8 | 1992 | 20 | |
| 9 | 2013 | 19 | |
| 10 | 2013 | 15 | |
| 11 | 2015 | 15 | |
| 12 | 2012 | 13 | |
| 13 | 2013 | 12 | |
| 14 | 2008 | 11 | |
| 15 | The Asaro Mudmen: Local Property, Public Culture? | 1996 | 10 |
| 16 | 2022 | 10 | |
| 17 | 2009 | 10 | |
| 18 | 1997 | 10 | |
| 19 | 1997 | 9 | |
| 20 | 1992 | 6 |
About Ton Otto
Ton Otto is a scholar working on Anthropology, Sociology and Political Science, Demography, Geography, Planning and Development and Museology, having authored 51 papers that have together received 705 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Anthropological Studies and Insights (14 papers), Island Studies and Pacific Affairs (14 papers), Pacific and Southeast Asian Studies (8 papers), Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies (5 papers), Crafts, Textile, and Design (5 papers), Participatory Visual Research Methods (4 papers), Museums and Cultural Heritage (4 papers) and Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Museology (92 citations), Geography, Planning and Development (132 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (115 citations), Anthropology (195 citations) and Demography (113 citations). Ton Otto has collaborated with scholars based in Denmark, Australia and Ukraine. Frequent co-authors include Rachel Charlotte Smith, Wendy Gunn, Rane Willerslev, Nicholas Thomas, Heike Winschiers‐Theophilus, Rosita Henry, Michael Wood, H.G.G.M. Driessen, Haidy Geismar and Colin Filer. Their work appears in journals such as Hau Journal of Ethnographic Theory, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, Anthropological Forum, The Asia Pacific Journal of Anthropology and Visual Anthropology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.