Tomas Sauer

55 papers receiving 412 citations

Peers

Tomas Sauer
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • Computational Mechanics 211
  • Ophthalmology 44
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 72
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 92
  • Applied Mathematics 37
Replace E.T.Y. Lee with:
E.T.Y. Lee United States
M. S. El‐Azab Egypt
K. Unsworth New Zealand
Frédéric de Gournay France
Xiquan Shi China
Martin Reimers Norway
David Krieg Austria
Chongyang Deng China
Juan Reyes‐Reyes Mexico
Zhang Liu China
Tomas Sauer relative to E.T.Y. Lee United States E.T.Y. Lee's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.8×
E.T.Y. Lee · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Tomas Sauer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tomas Sauer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tomas Sauer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tomas Sauer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tomas Sauer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tomas Sauer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tomas Sauer. The network helps show where Tomas Sauer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Tomas Sauer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Tomas Sauer Line = papers co-authored together Tomas Sauer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 60 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202045
2 200929
3 201128
4 201621
5 201819
6
Stationary vector subdivision-quotient ideals, differences and approximation power
200217
7 200417
8 201115
9 201614
10 201914
11 200714
12 201713
13 200312
14 201112
15 201812
16 201011
17 20099
18 20149
19 20028
20 20028

About Tomas Sauer

Tomas Sauer is a scholar working on Computational Mechanics, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Mechanical Engineering and Signal Processing, having authored 60 papers that have together received 425 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Numerical Analysis Techniques (27 papers), Polynomial and algebraic computation (14 papers), Image and Signal Denoising Methods (13 papers), Digital Filter Design and Implementation (6 papers), Tribology and Lubrication Engineering (6 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (5 papers), Corneal surgery and disorders (5 papers) and Advanced machining processes and optimization (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computational Mechanics (211 citations), Ophthalmology (44 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (72 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (92 citations) and Applied Mathematics (37 citations). Tomas Sauer has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Italy and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Jean‐Louis Merrien, Mariantonia Cotronei, Costanza Conti, Achim Langenbucher, Gitta Kutyniok, Vitalii Naumov, Filippo Giammaria Praticò, Rosario Fedele, Berthold Seitz and J.M. Peña. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, Journal of Approximation Theory, Advances in Computational Mathematics, BIT Numerical Mathematics and Computer Aided Geometric Design.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact