Tom van Wezel
Impact in
- Cancer Research top 0.5%
- Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 0.5%
- Genetic factors in colorectal cancer
Papers in
-
- Genetic factors in colorectal cancer 73
-
- Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics 49
- Co-authors
- Hans Morreau (102 shared papers)Ronald van Eijk (46 shared papers)Dina Ruano (36 shared papers)Jan Oosting (24 shared papers)Noel F.C.C. de Miranda (22 shared papers)Frederik J. Hes (30 shared papers)Marjo van Puijenbroek (18 shared papers)Vincent T.H.B.M. Smit (12 shared papers)
- Journals
- Familial Cancer (10 papers)PLoS ONE (9 papers)BMC Cancer (9 papers)European Journal of Human Genetics (8 papers)Gastroenterology (8 papers)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Tom van Wezel
187 papers receiving 5.8k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 119
- Cancer Research 1.5k
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 1.5k
- Oncology 1.8k
- Molecular Biology 2.1k
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 201
Countries citing papers authored by Tom van Wezel
This map shows the geographic impact of Tom van Wezel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tom van Wezel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tom van Wezel more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Tom van Wezel
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tom van Wezel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tom van Wezel. The network helps show where Tom van Wezel may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Tom van Wezel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 196 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2017 | 320 | |
| 2 | 2006 | 278 | |
| 3 | 2016 | 235 | |
| 4 | 2002 | 188 | |
| 5 | 2011 | 149 | |
| 6 | 2014 | 146 | |
| 7 | 2017 | 120 | |
| 8 | 2011 | 117 | |
| 9 | 1996 | 113 | |
| 10 | 2015 | 97 | |
| 11 | 2007 | 89 | |
| 12 | 2009 | 85 | |
| 13 | 2014 | 83 | |
| 14 | 2014 | 82 | |
| 15 | 2009 | 79 | |
| 16 | 2018 | 79 | |
| 17 | 2007 | 78 | |
| 18 | 2020 | 78 | |
| 19 | 2013 | 77 | |
| 20 | 2013 | 76 |
About Tom van Wezel
Tom van Wezel is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Cancer Research, Oncology, Molecular Biology and Genetics, having authored 196 papers that have together received 5.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (73 papers), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (49 papers), Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies (16 papers), BRCA gene mutations in cancer (12 papers), Thyroid Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (12 papers), Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (11 papers), Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (10 papers) and Cancer-related Molecular Pathways (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cancer Research (1.5k citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (1.5k citations), Oncology (1.8k citations), Molecular Biology (2.1k citations) and Obstetrics and Gynecology (201 citations). Tom van Wezel has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Hans Morreau, Ronald van Eijk, Dina Ruano, Jan Oosting, Noel F.C.C. de Miranda, Frederik J. Hes, Marjo van Puijenbroek, Vincent T.H.B.M. Smit, Willem E. Corver and Gert Jan Fleuren. Their work appears in journals such as Familial Cancer, PLoS ONE, BMC Cancer, European Journal of Human Genetics and Gastroenterology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.