Tom Rutter
Impact in
- General Decision Sciences top 10%
- Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Literature and Literary Theory top 10%
- Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism
- Literature: history, themes, analysis
- Early Modern Spanish Literature
Papers in
-
- Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism 8
- Literature: history, themes, analysis 4
-
- Philippine History and Culture 4
- Co-authors
- Taisuke Imai (3 shared papers)Colin F. Camerer (3 shared papers)Patricia Fumerton (1 shared paper)Mary Beth Rose (1 shared paper)Gordon McMullan (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The Modern Language Review (3 papers)Shakespeare (2 papers)The Economic Journal (1 paper)English Literary Renaissance (1 paper)Studies in English Literature 1500-1900 (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesGermany
In The Last Decade
Tom Rutter
21 papers receiving 110 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
- General Decision Sciences 24
- Literature and Literary Theory 59
- Classics 13
- Music 10
- Anthropology 24
Countries citing papers authored by Tom Rutter
This map shows the geographic impact of Tom Rutter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tom Rutter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tom Rutter more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Tom Rutter
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tom Rutter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tom Rutter. The network helps show where Tom Rutter may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 5 scholars most cited alongside Tom Rutter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2020 | 48 | |
| 2 | 2009 | 18 | |
| 3 | 2012 | 14 | |
| 4 | 2008 | 12 | |
| 5 | 2004 | 10 | |
| 6 | 2019 | 8 | |
| 7 | 2008 | 7 | |
| 8 | 2017 | 4 | |
| 9 | 2019 | 3 | |
| 10 | 2008 | 3 | |
| 11 | 2013 | 3 | |
| 12 | 2019 | 2 | |
| 13 | 2008 | 2 | |
| 14 | The actors in Sir Thomas More | 2007 | 2 |
| 15 | 2019 | 2 | |
| 16 | Merchants of Venice in a Knack to Know an Honest Man | 2006 | 1 |
| 17 | 2005 | 1 | |
| 18 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 19 | 2017 | 1 | |
| 20 | 2010 | 1 |
About Tom Rutter
Tom Rutter is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Anthropology, History, Economics and Econometrics and General Decision Sciences, having authored 24 papers that have together received 146 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (8 papers), Renaissance and Early Modern Studies (4 papers), Philippine History and Culture (4 papers), Literature: history, themes, analysis (4 papers), Economic and Environmental Valuation (3 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (3 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (2 papers) and Historical Economic and Social Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (24 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (59 citations), Classics (13 citations), Music (10 citations) and Anthropology (24 citations). Tom Rutter has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Taisuke Imai, Colin F. Camerer, Patricia Fumerton, Mary Beth Rose and Gordon McMullan. Their work appears in journals such as The Modern Language Review, Shakespeare, The Economic Journal, English Literary Renaissance and Studies in English Literature 1500-1900.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.