Tom Reith

1.3k citations
25 papers · 1.1k · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Tom Reith

25 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Tom Reith
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
  • Water Science and Technology 755
  • Biomedical Engineering 763
  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment 214
  • Mechanical Engineering 363
  • Computational Mechanics 138
Replace Mohammad H. Albeirutty with:
Mohammad H. Albeirutty Saudi Arabia
Pierrette Guichardon France
Majid Ahmadlouydarab Iran
Wytze Meindersma Netherlands
Lin Liang China
R.W. Schofield Australia
RICHARD R. KLIMPEL United States
Facheng Qiu China
Daniel Schweich France
Tom Reith relative to Mohammad H. Albeirutty Saudi Arabia Mohammad H. Albeirutty's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Mohammad H. Albeirutty · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Tom Reith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tom Reith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tom Reith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tom Reith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tom Reith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tom Reith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tom Reith. The network helps show where Tom Reith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside Tom Reith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Tom Reith Line = papers co-authored together Tom Reith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2002236
2 2005181
3 1968103
4 200493
5 200081
6 200471
7 200251
8 200550
9 197342
10 199941
11 196731
12 200123
13 199422
14 200021
15 199119
16 199717
17 200215
18 199313
19 19977
20 20005

About Tom Reith

Tom Reith is a scholar working on Water Science and Technology, Biomedical Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, Applied Mathematics and Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes, having authored 25 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Membrane Separation Technologies (8 papers), Membrane-based Ion Separation Techniques (6 papers), Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies (5 papers), Gas Dynamics and Kinetic Theory (4 papers), Phase Equilibria and Thermodynamics (3 papers), Minerals Flotation and Separation Techniques (3 papers), Membrane Separation and Gas Transport (3 papers) and Fluid Dynamics and Mixing (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Water Science and Technology (755 citations), Biomedical Engineering (763 citations), Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment (214 citations), Mechanical Engineering (363 citations) and Computational Mechanics (138 citations). Tom Reith has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Sweden and United States. Frequent co-authors include André B. de Haan, Fupeng Li, Wytze Meindersma, Caroliene M. Guijt, G.W. Meindersma, H.-S. Bosch, Waldo J. E. Beek, Imre G. Rácz, Cindy Huiskes and Venkat Raman. Their work appears in journals such as Desalination, Chemical Engineering Science, Journal of Membrane Science, Separation Science and Technology and Separation and Purification Technology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact