Tom Polacheck

1.9k citations
40 papers · 1.5k · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

Tom Polacheck

38 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Tom Polacheck
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 742
  • Global and Planetary Change 1.1k
  • Ecology 894
  • Aquatic Science 159
  • Ecological Modeling 36
Replace Jakob Gjøsæter with:
Jakob Gjøsæter Norway
Michael J. Wilberg United States
Elizabeth N. Brooks United States
HP Benoît Canada
Pierre Kleiber United States
Milo D. Adkison United States
Bruce D. Mapstone Australia
RA Myers Canada
Jake F. Schweigert Canada
Geoffrey P. Kirkwood United Kingdom
Tom Polacheck relative to Jakob Gjøsæter Norway Jakob Gjøsæter's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Jakob Gjøsæter · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Tom Polacheck

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tom Polacheck's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tom Polacheck with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tom Polacheck more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tom Polacheck

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tom Polacheck. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tom Polacheck. The network helps show where Tom Polacheck may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Tom Polacheck, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Tom Polacheck Line = papers co-authored together Tom Polacheck links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1990227
2 1993179
3 2001152
4 2003145
5 200577
6 200270
7 200464
8 199862
9 199760
10 200752
11 200640
12 200436
13 200435
14 201234
15 200434
16 199230
17 200829
18 199929
19 199922
20 201117

About Tom Polacheck

Tom Polacheck is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Global and Planetary Change, Ecology, Statistics and Probability and Aquatic Science, having authored 40 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Marine and fisheries research (25 papers), Fish Ecology and Management Studies (21 papers), Marine Bivalve and Aquaculture Studies (14 papers), Avian ecology and behavior (7 papers), Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies (5 papers), Census and Population Estimation (4 papers), Marine animal studies overview (4 papers) and Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (742 citations), Global and Planetary Change (1.1k citations), Ecology (894 citations), Aquatic Science (159 citations) and Ecological Modeling (36 citations). Tom Polacheck has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and France. Frequent co-authors include J. Paige Eveson, G.M. Laslett, Geoffrey N. Tuck, Neil Klaer, André E. Punt, Ray Hilborn, Cathy Bulman, Henri Weimerskirch, John P. Croxall and Maria Cristina Pinedo. Their work appears in journals such as Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, Marine Policy, ICES Journal of Marine Science, Emu - Austral Ornithology and Fisheries Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact