Tom Payne

1.3k citations
17 papers · 482 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

    • Fungal and yeast genetics research 2
    • Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies 2
    • Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress and Disease 2
    • Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases 2

Tom Payne

16 papers receiving 447 citations

Peers

Tom Payne
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
  • Computer Networks and Communications 188
  • Management Science and Operations Research 73
  • Computer Science Applications 26
  • Cell Biology 70
  • Biotechnology 36
Replace Monika Schubert with:
Monika Schubert Austria
Pablo Villarreal Argentina
Michael Zapf Germany
Robin Paul United States
Ken Robinson Australia
Baoping Liu China
Ian Holyer United Kingdom
María Teresa Gómez-López Spain
Chao‐Chin Wu Taiwan
Lincoln Stein United States
Tom Payne relative to Monika Schubert Austria Monika Schubert's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Monika Schubert · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Tom Payne

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tom Payne's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tom Payne with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tom Payne more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tom Payne

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tom Payne. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tom Payne. The network helps show where Tom Payne may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Tom Payne, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Tom Payne Line = papers co-authored together Tom Payne links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 1991146
2 200865
3 200244
4 199041
5 200433
6 201033
7
Mapping to MeSH: The Art of Trapping MeSH Equivalence from within Narrative Text
198828
8 200828
9 202023
10 200521
11 20065
12
Investigating Generative Factors of Score Matrices
20074
13
A space-based classification system for RF transients
19934
14 20063
15 20062
16 20151
17 20061

About Tom Payne

Tom Payne is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cell Biology, Computer Networks and Communications, Information Systems and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 17 papers that have together received 482 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress and Disease (2 papers), Fungal and yeast genetics research (2 papers), Optimization and Search Problems (2 papers), Experimental Learning in Engineering (2 papers), Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity (2 papers), Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (2 papers), Topic Modeling (2 papers) and Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Networks and Communications (188 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (73 citations), Computer Science Applications (26 citations), Cell Biology (70 citations) and Biotechnology (36 citations). Tom Payne has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Marek Chrobák, John M. Whipps, John P. Clarkson, Andrew Mead, David B. Archer, Simon V. Avery, Darrell Sleep, Howard Karloff, Sundar Vishwanathan and Leslie Evans. Their work appears in journals such as Plant Pathology, FEBS Letters, SIAM Journal on Discrete Mathematics, Microbial Cell Factories and Journal of Biological Chemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact