Tom Page

2.7k citations
144 papers · 1.9k · h-index 22

Impact in

Papers in

Tom Page

127 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers

Tom Page
Comparison fields: 5 of 146
  • Human-Computer Interaction 200
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 250
  • Library and Information Sciences 24
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 174
  • Information Systems and Management 86
Replace Jan Maarten Schraagen with:
Jan Maarten Schraagen Netherlands
Ricardo Buettner Germany
Yan Luximon Hong Kong
Jan Noyes United Kingdom
Ann Heylighen Belgium
Luciano Gamberini Italy
Simone Borsci United Kingdom
Shanna Daly United States
Glyn Lawson United Kingdom
Muhammad Nazrul Islam Bangladesh
Tom Page relative to Jan Maarten Schraagen Netherlands Jan Maarten Schraagen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.1×
Jan Maarten Schraagen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Tom Page

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tom Page's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tom Page with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tom Page more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tom Page

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tom Page. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tom Page. The network helps show where Tom Page may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Tom Page, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Tom Page Line = papers co-authored together Tom Page links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 144 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017257
2 201593
3 201473
4 201572
5 200566
6 201466
7 202060
8 201058
9 201056
10 201447
11 201547
12 201543
13 201135
14 201834
15 201333
16 201732
17 200632
18 201932
19 201830
20 201027

About Tom Page

Tom Page is a scholar working on Education, Human-Computer Interaction, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Mechanical Engineering and Developmental and Educational Psychology, having authored 144 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Online and Blended Learning (15 papers), Manufacturing Process and Optimization (11 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (11 papers), Design Education and Practice (10 papers), Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts (9 papers), Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes (9 papers), Quality and Supply Management (8 papers) and Open Education and E-Learning (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (200 citations), Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (250 citations), Library and Information Sciences (24 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (174 citations) and Information Systems and Management (86 citations). Tom Page has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, India and Finland. Frequent co-authors include Gísli Þorsteinsson, P. Asokan, Afroditi Pina, Sube Banerjee, Nicolas Farina, Anna Brown, Gill Livingston, Stephanie Daley, Joanna Murray and Ann Bowling. Their work appears in journals such as Studies in Informatics and Control, International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation, International Journal of Agile Systems and Management, BMJ Open and International Journal of Manufacturing Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact