Tom Molet

834 citations
19 papers · 478 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Tom Molet

19 papers receiving 384 citations

Peers

Tom Molet
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
  • Human-Computer Interaction 128
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 266
  • Control and Systems Engineering 237
  • Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design 22
  • Social Psychology 55
Replace Sang-Hack Jung with:
Sang-Hack Jung United States
Irene Albrecht Germany
Jeff K. T. Tang Hong Kong
Arjan Egges Netherlands
Amaury Aubel Switzerland
Margaret Minsky United States
Andrew Gilbert United Kingdom
Robin Wolff United Kingdom
Laura Arns United States
Tomislav Pejša United States
Tom Molet relative to Sang-Hack Jung United States Sang-Hack Jung's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.6×
Sang-Hack Jung · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Tom Molet

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tom Molet's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tom Molet with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tom Molet more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tom Molet

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tom Molet. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tom Molet. The network helps show where Tom Molet may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Tom Molet, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Tom Molet Line = papers co-authored together Tom Molet links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 199974
2 199569
3 200456
4 200356
5 200443
6 200242
7 199939
8
LIFEPLUS: Revival of life in ancient Pompeii, Virtual Systems and Multimedia
200222
9
Interactive Scenario Immersion: Health Emergency Decision Training in JUST Project
200213
10 200112
11 200311
12 199910
13 20047
14 20026
15 20005
16 20005
17 20043
18 20033
19 19982

About Tom Molet

Tom Molet is a scholar working on Control and Systems Engineering, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Human-Computer Interaction, Computational Mechanics and Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design, having authored 19 papers that have together received 478 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Human Motion and Animation (15 papers), Human Pose and Action Recognition (5 papers), Video Analysis and Summarization (5 papers), Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts (4 papers), Advanced Vision and Imaging (4 papers), Augmented Reality Applications (3 papers), Simulation and Modeling Applications (3 papers) and Hand Gesture Recognition Systems (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (128 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (266 citations), Control and Systems Engineering (237 citations), Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design (22 citations) and Social Psychology (55 citations). Tom Molet has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, Italy and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Nadia Magnenat‐Thalmann, Daniël Thalmann, Ronan Boulic, George Papagiannakis, Arjan Egges, Igor Pandžić, Daniel Thalmann, Branislav Ulicny, Bruno Herbelin and Hansrudi Noser. Their work appears in journals such as Computer Graphics Forum, PRESENCE Virtual and Augmented Reality, IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications and Biomedizinische Technik/Biomedical Engineering.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact