Tom Inglis

1.9k citations
50 papers · 947 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Tom Inglis

46 papers receiving 778 citations

Peers

Tom Inglis
Comparison fields: 5 of 112
  • Sociology and Political Science 500
  • Gender Studies 94
  • Animal Science and Zoology 75
  • Geography, Planning and Development 40
  • Health 57
Replace Lorraine van Blerk with:
Lorraine van Blerk United Kingdom
Marilyn Porter Canada
Almudena Moreno Mínguez Spain
Margaret Clark United States
Carol Jenkins United States
Barbara Mitchell Canada
Denise Russell Australia
Iris Epstein Canada
Karen Sayer United Kingdom
Margaret Stacey United Kingdom
Tom Inglis relative to Lorraine van Blerk United Kingdom Lorraine van Blerk's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×9.4×
Lorraine van Blerk · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Tom Inglis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tom Inglis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tom Inglis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tom Inglis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tom Inglis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tom Inglis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tom Inglis. The network helps show where Tom Inglis may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Tom Inglis, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Tom Inglis Line = papers co-authored together Tom Inglis links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 50 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Moral monopoly: the rise and fall of the Catholic Church in modern Ireland
1998204
2 1997143
3 200758
4
Moral monopoly : the Catholic Church in modern Irish society
198752
5
Global Ireland: Same Difference
200743
6 201842
7 201938
8 200535
9
Truth, power, and lies : Irish society and the case of the Kerry babies
200434
10 200929
11 202022
12 201220
13 199716
14 200115
15 201214
16 201113
17 201411
18 200211
19 200611
20 202210

About Tom Inglis

Tom Inglis is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Surgery, Animal Science and Zoology, Education and Infectious Diseases, having authored 50 papers that have together received 947 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Irish and British Studies (16 papers), Religion and Society Interactions (6 papers), Animal Virus Infections Studies (4 papers), Social and Cultural Dynamics (4 papers), Viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology (4 papers), Philippine History and Culture (3 papers), Trauma and Emergency Care Studies (2 papers) and Viral Infections and Immunology Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sociology and Political Science (500 citations), Gender Studies (94 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (75 citations), Geography, Planning and Development (40 citations) and Health (57 citations). Tom Inglis has collaborated with scholars based in Ireland, Canada and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Frank van der Meer, Mohamed Faizal Abdul-Careem, Gary J. Hooper, Alastair G. Rothwell, Chris Frampton, Brent F. Nelsen, Travis Marion, Tamir Ailon, Brian K. Kwon and Scott Paquette. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Contemporary Religion, The Spine Journal, Adult Education Quarterly, Viruses and ANZ Journal of Surgery.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact