Tom Grimes

18 papers receiving 418 citations

Peers

Tom Grimes
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Literature and Literary Theory 159
  • Communication 99
  • Applied Psychology 36
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 88
  • Sociology and Political Science 275
Replace Cees M. Koolstra with:
Cees M. Koolstra Netherlands
Karyn Riddle United States
John A. Velez United States
G. Blake Armstrong United States
Edward Downs United States
Helmut Appel Germany
Lara N. Wolfers Germany
James A. Keaten United States
Joshua D. Wondra United States
Jordan Carpenter United States
Tom Grimes relative to Cees M. Koolstra Netherlands Cees M. Koolstra's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Cees M. Koolstra · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Tom Grimes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tom Grimes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tom Grimes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tom Grimes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tom Grimes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tom Grimes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tom Grimes. The network helps show where Tom Grimes may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside Tom Grimes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Tom Grimes Line = papers co-authored together Tom Grimes links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 199193
2 199069
3 201965
4 200557
5
Media Violence and Aggression: Science and Ideology
200757
6 202056
7 199629
8 199021
9 201817
10 199714
11 19957
12 20086
13 19945
14 20014
15 20112
16 20132
17 19962
18 20032

About Tom Grimes

Tom Grimes is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Literature and Literary Theory, Social Psychology, Communication and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 18 papers that have together received 508 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Media Influence and Health (7 papers), Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression (4 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (3 papers), Child Development and Digital Technology (3 papers), Social Media and Politics (2 papers), Multisensory perception and integration (2 papers), Visual Attention and Saliency Detection (2 papers) and Authorship Attribution and Profiling (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (159 citations), Communication (99 citations), Applied Psychology (36 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (88 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (275 citations). Tom Grimes has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Stephanie L. Dailey, Natalie A. Ceballos, Krista Howard, Deborah Potter, James A. Anderson, Anthony Robinson, Yongmei Lu, R.P. Taleyarkhan, Kate Peirce and Jeffrey A. Gibbons. Their work appears in journals such as Human Communication Research, Mass Communication & Society, Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, Annals of the International Communication Association and Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact