Tom Ford

2.0k citations
37 papers · 1.4k · 1 hit paper · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Tom Ford

35 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Tom Ford's Hit Papers

A review of tufa and travertine deposits of the world 1996 · 667 citations
6670+10+20Years since publication200400600

Peers

Tom Ford
Comparison fields: 5 of 110
  • Paleontology 526
  • Earth-Surface Processes 272
  • Atmospheric Science 562
  • Geochemistry and Petrology 133
  • Geophysics 239
Replace Matti Räsänen with:
Matti Räsänen Finland
Paul Bernier France
H. Faure France
B. Artur Stankiewicz United Kingdom
J. D. A. Clarke Australia
Jean‐Louis Dommergues France
Joyce Lundberg Canada
Randall F. Miller Canada
Kenneth F. Rijsdijk Netherlands
John Warren Huntley United States
Tom Ford relative to Matti Räsänen Finland Matti Räsänen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Matti Räsänen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Tom Ford

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tom Ford's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tom Ford with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tom Ford more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tom Ford

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tom Ford. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tom Ford. The network helps show where Tom Ford may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Tom Ford, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Tom Ford Line = papers co-authored together Tom Ford links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
A review of tufa and travertine deposits of the world
Hit paper breakdown →
1996667
2 1958171
3 2003154
4 202151
5 201148
6 197237
7 201733
8 201329
9 202129
10 199527
11 198725
12 196625
13 201518
14 196815
15 201113
16 197113
17 202111
18 199010
19 20218
20 20237

About Tom Ford

Tom Ford is a scholar working on Atmospheric Science, Paleontology, Oceanography, Ecology and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 37 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (9 papers), Geological formations and processes (5 papers), Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping (5 papers), Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils (5 papers), Marine and coastal plant biology (4 papers), Mycobacterium research and diagnosis (4 papers), Geological and Geochemical Analysis (3 papers) and Microbial infections and disease research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Paleontology (526 citations), Earth-Surface Processes (272 citations), Atmospheric Science (562 citations), Geochemistry and Petrology (133 citations) and Geophysics (239 citations). Tom Ford has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include H.M. Pedley, Alexei J. Drummond, William Hoppitt, Trevor H. Worthy, Eske Willerslev, Alan Cooper, Michael Bunce, Robin Skuce, Adrian Allen and C. Downie. Their work appears in journals such as Vaccine, Geological Society of America Bulletin, The Journal of Immunology, Journal of Leukocyte Biology and Biology Letters.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact