Tom Ford

2.0k citations
36 papers · 1.3k · 1 hit paper · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Tom Ford

34 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Tom Ford's Hit Papers

A review of tufa and travertine deposits of the world 1996 · 616 citations
6160+10+20Years since publication200400600

Peers

Tom Ford
Comparison fields: 5 of 112
  • Paleontology 486
  • Earth-Surface Processes 251
  • Atmospheric Science 507
  • Geochemistry and Petrology 121
  • Geophysics 198
Replace Matti Räsänen with:
Matti Räsänen Finland
H. Faure France
J. D. A. Clarke Australia
B. Artur Stankiewicz United Kingdom
Jean‐Louis Dommergues France
Randall F. Miller Canada
Kenneth F. Rijsdijk Netherlands
Charlie J. Underwood United Kingdom
Javier Guerrero Colombia
Robert B. Kidd United Kingdom
Tom Ford relative to Matti Räsänen Finland Matti Räsänen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Matti Räsänen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Tom Ford

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tom Ford's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tom Ford with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tom Ford more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tom Ford

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tom Ford. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tom Ford. The network helps show where Tom Ford may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Tom Ford, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Tom Ford Line = papers co-authored together Tom Ford links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
A review of tufa and travertine deposits of the world
Hit paper breakdown →
1996616
2 1958158
3 2003146
4 202148
5 201143
6 201731
7 202128
8 201328
9 199527
10 198725
11 196625
12 201516
13 197113
14 201112
15 199010
16 20219
17 20218
18 19727
19 20187
20 20167

About Tom Ford

Tom Ford is a scholar working on Atmospheric Science, Paleontology, Oceanography, Ecology and Earth-Surface Processes, having authored 36 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (9 papers), Geological formations and processes (5 papers), Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping (5 papers), Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils (5 papers), Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology (4 papers), Mycobacterium research and diagnosis (4 papers), Coastal wetland ecosystem dynamics (4 papers) and Marine and coastal plant biology (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Paleontology (486 citations), Earth-Surface Processes (251 citations), Atmospheric Science (507 citations), Geochemistry and Petrology (121 citations) and Geophysics (198 citations). Tom Ford has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include H.M. Pedley, Michael Bunce, Alan Cooper, Trevor H. Worthy, William Hoppitt, Eske Willerslev, Alexei J. Drummond, Adrian Allen, Robin Skuce and C. Downie. Their work appears in journals such as Vaccine, Biology Letters, Geological Magazine, Tectonophysics and Journal of Leukocyte Biology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact