Tom Carrell

933 citations
24 papers · 632 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Tom Carrell

22 papers receiving 619 citations

Peers

Tom Carrell
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
  • Human-Computer Interaction 82
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 368
  • Surgery 263
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 126
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 90
Replace P Vávra with:
P Vávra Czechia
Christoph Zoeller Germany
Li-Ming Su United States
Stine Maya Dreier Sørensen Denmark
Henrik Brun Norway
M. Konstantinidis Greece
Tristan P. C. van Doormaal Netherlands
Bing Wu China
Gregor A. Stavrou Germany
Mark Macfarlane United States
Tom Carrell relative to P Vávra Czechia P Vávra's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.0×
P Vávra · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Tom Carrell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tom Carrell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tom Carrell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tom Carrell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tom Carrell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tom Carrell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tom Carrell. The network helps show where Tom Carrell may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Tom Carrell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Tom Carrell Line = papers co-authored together Tom Carrell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2002119
2 2014102
3 200656
4 201252
5 201539
6 201438
7 201035
8 201133
9 201125
10 201322
11 200819
12 201016
13 200916
14 201313
15 201111
16 201010
17 20107
18 20137
19 20135
20 20244

About Tom Carrell

Tom Carrell is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Surgery, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 24 papers that have together received 632 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Aortic aneurysm repair treatments (15 papers), Vascular Procedures and Complications (9 papers), Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches (8 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (5 papers), Infectious Aortic and Vascular Conditions (4 papers), Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging (3 papers), Medical Image Segmentation Techniques (3 papers) and Image and Object Detection Techniques (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (82 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (368 citations), Surgery (263 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (126 citations) and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (90 citations). Tom Carrell has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Graeme Penney, Alberto Smith, K G Burnand, Graham Wells, John M. Clements, Neville Dastur, Bijan Modarai, Peter R. Taylor, Rachel E. Bell and Kenton O’Hara. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Vascular Surgery, Journal of Endovascular Therapy, Vascular, CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology and Medical Image Analysis.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact