Tom Carrell

942 citations
26 papers · 695 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Tom Carrell

24 papers receiving 672 citations

Peers

Tom Carrell
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
  • Human-Computer Interaction 100
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 337
  • Surgery 175
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 94
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 57
Replace Adam Meneghetti with:
Adam Meneghetti Canada
Gary W. Chien United States
Stine Maya Dreier Sørensen Denmark
Li-Ming Su United States
Christoph Zoeller Germany
P Zonča Czechia
P Vávra Czechia
Ko Watanabe Japan
Takahiro Hosoi Japan
Erlend Fagertun Hofstad Norway
Tom Carrell relative to Adam Meneghetti Canada Adam Meneghetti's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.9×
Adam Meneghetti · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Tom Carrell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tom Carrell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tom Carrell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tom Carrell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tom Carrell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tom Carrell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tom Carrell. The network helps show where Tom Carrell may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Tom Carrell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Tom Carrell Line = papers co-authored together Tom Carrell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2014126
2 2002122
3 200656
4 201254
5 201542
6 201439
7 201037
8 201136
9 201125
10 201325
11 200821
12 201117
13 201016
14 200916
15 201314
16 201111
17 201010
18 20107
19 20137
20 20136

About Tom Carrell

Tom Carrell is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Surgery, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 26 papers that have together received 695 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Aortic aneurysm repair treatments (15 papers), Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches (9 papers), Vascular Procedures and Complications (8 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (3 papers), Infectious Aortic and Vascular Conditions (3 papers), Medical Image Segmentation Techniques (3 papers), Renal and Vascular Pathologies (2 papers) and Medical Imaging and Analysis (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (100 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (337 citations), Surgery (175 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (94 citations) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (57 citations). Tom Carrell has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Graeme Penney, Andreas Varnavas, Alberto Smith, K G Burnand, Neville Dastur, John M. Clements, Graham Wells, Bijan Modarai, Peter R. Taylor and Kenton O’Hara. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Vascular Surgery, Journal of Endovascular Therapy, Vascular, CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology and Medical Image Analysis.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact