Peter Taylor

190 papers receiving 3.2k citations

Peers

Peter Taylor
Comparison fields: 5 of 170
  • Management Information Systems 1.3k
  • Management Science and Operations Research 618
  • Statistics and Probability 262
  • Emergency Medical Services 192
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 409
Replace H. Edwin Romeijn with:
H. Edwin Romeijn United States
Ruth Williams United States
Donald P. Gaver United States
Pierre L’Ecuyer Canada
William A. Massey United States
J. Michael Harrison United States
James R. Wilson United States
Joseph Abate United States
Linda Zhao United States
Julian Keilson United States
Peter Taylor relative to H. Edwin Romeijn United States H. Edwin Romeijn's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.5×
H. Edwin Romeijn · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Taylor

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Taylor's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Taylor with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Taylor more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Taylor

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Taylor. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Taylor. The network helps show where Peter Taylor may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Taylor, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Taylor Line = papers co-authored together Peter Taylor links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 197 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1995197
2 2009170
3 2016152
4 2006147
5 201296
6 199592
7 201491
8 199081
9 200180
10 201679
11 201266
12 199664
13 201362
14 200056
15 201253
16 200553
17 200552
18 198949
19 199049
20 201047

About Peter Taylor

Peter Taylor is a scholar working on Management Information Systems, Management Science and Operations Research, Computer Networks and Communications, Statistics and Probability and Electrical and Electronic Engineering, having authored 197 papers that have together received 3.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Queuing Theory Analysis (94 papers), Probability and Risk Models (31 papers), Simulation Techniques and Applications (18 papers), Petri Nets in System Modeling (15 papers), Random Matrices and Applications (15 papers), Network Traffic and Congestion Control (14 papers), Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches (13 papers) and Aortic aneurysm repair treatments (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management Information Systems (1.3k citations), Management Science and Operations Research (618 citations), Statistics and Probability (262 citations), Emergency Medical Services (192 citations) and Computational Theory and Mathematics (409 citations). Peter Taylor has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include W. Henderson, Nigel Bean, Robert F. Adler, A. E. Krzesinski, Małgorzata M. O’Reilly, Guy Latouche, Paul Keeler, Derek Abbott, Gregory P. Harmer and V. Ramaswami. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Applied Probability, Queueing Systems, Advances in Applied Probability, Stochastic Models and Probability in the Engineering and Informational Sciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact