Todd Wagner

801 citations
4 papers · 431 · 1 hit paper · h-index 3

Impact in

Papers in

Todd Wagner

4 papers receiving 418 citations

Todd Wagner's Hit Papers

Test of the Equivalence Principle Using a Rotating Torsion Balance 2008 · 409 citations
4090+6+12Years since publication100200300400

Peers

Todd Wagner
Comparison fields: 5 of 32
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 216
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 251
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 94
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 210
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 20
Replace G. Smith with:
G. Smith United States
M. Pospelov Canada
Evgeny Kovalchuk Germany
Dirk Puetzfeld Germany
Frédéric Meynadier France
T. Hoffman United States
D. Gao China
Pacôme Delva France
G. Messineo Italy
J. K. Hoskins United States
Todd Wagner relative to G. Smith United States G. Smith's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
G. Smith · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Todd Wagner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Todd Wagner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Todd Wagner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Todd Wagner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Todd Wagner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Todd Wagner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Todd Wagner. The network helps show where Todd Wagner may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside Todd Wagner, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Todd Wagner Line = papers co-authored together Todd Wagner links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

4 of 4 papers shown
#Work
1
Test of the Equivalence Principle Using a Rotating Torsion Balance
Hit paper breakdown →
2008409
2 201313
3 20098
4
Beyond Mutual Shaping -- Rethinking Symmetry and Causality in the Treatment of Socio-material Systems
20081

About Todd Wagner

Todd Wagner is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Sociology and Political Science, Oceanography and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, having authored 4 papers that have together received 431 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Relativity and Gravitational Theory (2 papers), Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena (1 paper), Complex Systems and Decision Making (1 paper), Quantum, superfluid, helium dynamics (1 paper), Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (1 paper), Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (1 paper), Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (1 paper) and Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (216 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (251 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (94 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (210 citations) and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (20 citations). Todd Wagner has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include E. G. Adelberger, Stephan Schlamminger, J. H. Gundlach, K.-Y. Choi, Jens H. Gundlach, Stefan Klein, Kai Reimers and R. Johnston. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review Letters, Space Science Reviews, RWTH Publications (RWTH Aachen) and Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact