Tod Rutherford

39 papers receiving 391 citations

Peers

Tod Rutherford
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
  • Public Administration 113
  • Business and International Management 26
  • Strategy and Management 182
  • Urban Studies 60
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 51
Replace Helmut Voelzkow with:
Helmut Voelzkow Germany
Folker Fröbel
Otto Kreye
Guido Starosta Argentina
Alan Cawson United Kingdom
José Manuel Salazar-Xirinachs United States
Phillip Toner Australia
Anette Haas Germany
Anjel Errasti Spain
Hyun‐Chin Lim South Korea
Tod Rutherford relative to Helmut Voelzkow Germany Helmut Voelzkow's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.5×
Helmut Voelzkow · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Tod Rutherford

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tod Rutherford's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tod Rutherford with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tod Rutherford more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tod Rutherford

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tod Rutherford. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tod Rutherford. The network helps show where Tod Rutherford may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside Tod Rutherford, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Tod Rutherford Line = papers co-authored together Tod Rutherford links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200770
2 201036
3 201725
4 200224
5 201424
6 200721
7 200019
8 199215
9 200813
10 200411
11 200711
12 201610
13 201210
14 20069
15 20219
16 19949
17 19948
18 20048
19 20018
20 20128

About Tod Rutherford

Tod Rutherford is a scholar working on Public Administration, General Health Professions, Strategy and Management, Political Science and International Relations and Urban Studies, having authored 40 papers that have together received 434 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Labor Movements and Unions (23 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (16 papers), Global trade, sustainability, and social impact (11 papers), Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism (6 papers), Global trade and economics (5 papers), Social Sciences and Governance (4 papers), Asian Industrial and Economic Development (3 papers) and Social Policy and Reform Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (113 citations), Business and International Management (26 citations), Strategy and Management (182 citations), Urban Studies (60 citations) and General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (51 citations). Tod Rutherford has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include John Holmes, Meric S. Gertler, Gregor Murray, Phil Almond, Tom McIntosh, Nigel Thrift, Peter Williams, Andrew Leyshon, Jonathan V. Beaverstock and Paul Parker. Their work appears in journals such as Regional Studies, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, Human Geography, Economic Geography and Cambridge Journal of Regions Economy and Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact