Toby Miles‐Johnson

34 papers receiving 412 citations

Peers

Toby Miles‐Johnson
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
  • Gender Studies 142
  • Political Science and International Relations 241
  • Health 74
  • Sociology and Political Science 313
  • Social Psychology 92
Replace Ruohui Zhao with:
Ruohui Zhao Macao
Andrea J. Ritchie United States
Antje Röder Ireland
Hillary Potter United States
Philip M Stinson United States
Brian Reaves United States
Venessa Garcia United States
J. Scott Carter United States
Melissa Powell-Williams United States
Anthony W. Hoskin United States
Toby Miles‐Johnson relative to Ruohui Zhao Macao Ruohui Zhao's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Ruohui Zhao · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Toby Miles‐Johnson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Toby Miles‐Johnson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Toby Miles‐Johnson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Toby Miles‐Johnson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Toby Miles‐Johnson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Toby Miles‐Johnson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Toby Miles‐Johnson. The network helps show where Toby Miles‐Johnson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside Toby Miles‐Johnson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Toby Miles‐Johnson Line = papers co-authored together Toby Miles‐Johnson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201337
2 201736
3 201531
4 201330
5 201829
6 201929
7 201729
8 201525
9 201523
10 201919
11 201617
12 201514
13 20199
14 20229
15 20199
16 20209
17 20228
18 20248
19 20227
20 20236

About Toby Miles‐Johnson

Toby Miles‐Johnson is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Gender Studies, Health and Social Psychology, having authored 36 papers that have together received 425 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Policing Practices and Perceptions (28 papers), Crime Patterns and Interventions (21 papers), Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies (11 papers), Intimate Partner and Family Violence (7 papers), LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy (5 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (5 papers), Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (4 papers) and Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (142 citations), Political Science and International Relations (241 citations), Health (74 citations), Sociology and Political Science (313 citations) and Social Psychology (92 citations). Toby Miles‐Johnson has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and Slovenia. Frequent co-authors include Sharon Pickering, Yurong Wang, Lorraine Mazerolle, Harley Williamson, Jodi Death, Matthew Ball, Paul Smith, Garry Stevens, Francis D. Boateng and Jeremy M. Wilson. Their work appears in journals such as Police Practice and Research, Policing & Society, Policing A Journal of Policy and Practice, Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and Behaviour and Global Crime.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact