T.M.A.L. Klem

792 citations
39 papers · 543 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

    • Hip and Femur Fractures 7
    • Diagnosis and Treatment of Venous Diseases 5
    • Breast Implant and Reconstruction 3
    • Breast Cancer Treatment Studies 8

T.M.A.L. Klem

35 papers receiving 531 citations

Peers

T.M.A.L. Klem
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
  • Internal Medicine 51
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 39
  • Surgery 295
  • Cancer Research 52
  • Emergency Medical Services 14
Replace José Luis Zamorano with:
José Luis Zamorano Spain
Jiong Mei China
Christian Pfluecke Germany
Deok Heon Lee South Korea
Hideaki Manabe Japan
Kuo Zhao China
B Holroyd United Kingdom
Ahmed Abidia United Kingdom
Bernard Eisenmann France
Andrei Kindzelski United States
T.M.A.L. Klem relative to José Luis Zamorano Spain José Luis Zamorano's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
José Luis Zamorano · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by T.M.A.L. Klem

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of T.M.A.L. Klem's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by T.M.A.L. Klem with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites T.M.A.L. Klem more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by T.M.A.L. Klem

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by T.M.A.L. Klem. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by T.M.A.L. Klem. The network helps show where T.M.A.L. Klem may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside T.M.A.L. Klem, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with T.M.A.L. Klem Line = papers co-authored together T.M.A.L. Klem links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 39 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201783
2 201964
3 200851
4 202147
5 200842
6 201925
7 201821
8 201320
9 201517
10 201216
11 202115
12 202014
13 200813
14 202113
15 202113
16 201812
17 202011
18 201111
19 201810
20 20187

About T.M.A.L. Klem

T.M.A.L. Klem is a scholar working on Surgery, Cancer Research, Epidemiology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Radiation, having authored 39 papers that have together received 543 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (8 papers), Hip and Femur Fractures (7 papers), Diagnosis and Treatment of Venous Diseases (5 papers), Breast Implant and Reconstruction (3 papers), Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques (2 papers), Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (2 papers), Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging (1 paper) and Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Internal Medicine (51 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (39 citations), Surgery (295 citations), Cancer Research (52 citations) and Emergency Medical Services (14 citations). T.M.A.L. Klem has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Canada and Portugal. Frequent co-authors include Gert R. Roukema, Louis de Jong, T. Martijn Kuijper, J.E. Sybrandy, Erwin Birnie, W. W. Vrijland, Brechtje A. Grotenhuis, Jelle W. Raats, Cornelis Verhoef and Adriaan Moelker. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Surgical Oncology, British Journal of Radiology, BMJ Open, European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery and Clinical Breast Cancer.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact