Tina Hoff

633 citations
8 papers · 459 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

Tina Hoff

8 papers receiving 404 citations

Peers

Tina Hoff
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • General Health Professions 219
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 41
  • Gender Studies 44
  • Pharmacy 20
  • Economics and Econometrics 121
Replace Marla E. Salmon with:
Marla E. Salmon United States
Anand Grover United States
Tumaini Nyamhanga Tanzania
Ashley Fraser United States
Isabel Craveiro Portugal
Margaret L. Schmitt United States
Marta Schaaf United States
Kátia Virgínia de Oliveira Feliciano Brazil
William Winfrey United States
Judi Aubel United States
Tina Hoff relative to Marla E. Salmon United States Marla E. Salmon's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×13.7×
Marla E. Salmon · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Tina Hoff

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tina Hoff's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tina Hoff with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tina Hoff more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tina Hoff

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tina Hoff. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tina Hoff. The network helps show where Tina Hoff may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside Tina Hoff, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Tina Hoff Line = papers co-authored together Tina Hoff links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
#Work
1 1998179
2
National Survey of Adolescents and Young Adults: Sexual Health Knowledge Attitudes and Experiences.
2003141
3 199853
4 197546
5 199725
6
Decentralized medical education in rural communities: the circuit rider connection.
20087
7 19995
8 20053

About Tina Hoff

Tina Hoff is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Political Science and International Relations, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Management of Technology and Innovation, having authored 8 papers that have together received 459 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (3 papers), Reproductive Health and Contraception (2 papers), Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations (2 papers), Blood donation and transfusion practices (1 paper), Global Maternal and Child Health (1 paper), Healthcare Policy and Management (1 paper), Child and Adolescent Health (1 paper) and Policy Transfer and Learning (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Health Professions (219 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (41 citations), Gender Studies (44 citations), Pharmacy (20 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (121 citations). Tina Hoff has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include James Davis, Drew E. Altman, Larry Levitt, Robert J. Blendon, Mollyann Brodie, John M. Benson, Suzanne Delbanco, Felicia H. Stewart, Mary McIntosh and Betty Skipper. Their work appears in journals such as Health Affairs, Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, Transfusion, PubMed and Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact