Timothy Webmoor
Impact in
- Archeology top 2%
- Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation
- Archaeology and Rock Art Studies
- Space and Planetary Science top 2%
- Archaeological Research and Protection
Papers in
-
- Anthropological Studies and Insights 3
-
- Archaeology and ancient environmental studies 2
- Co-authors
- Christopher Witmore (4 shared papers)Bjørnar Olsen (2 shared papers)Michael Shanks (2 shared papers)Annamaria Carusi (2 shared papers)Aud Sissel Hoel (1 shared paper)Steve Woolgar (1 shared paper)Gordana Vunjak‐Novakovic (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Complutum (2 papers)Visual Anthropology Review (1 paper)World Archaeology (1 paper)Information Communication & Society (1 paper)Journal of Social Archaeology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Timothy Webmoor
11 papers receiving 396 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
- Archeology 60
- Space and Planetary Science 57
- Geography, Planning and Development 137
- Paleontology 165
- Anthropology 199
Countries citing papers authored by Timothy Webmoor
This map shows the geographic impact of Timothy Webmoor's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Timothy Webmoor with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Timothy Webmoor more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Timothy Webmoor
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Timothy Webmoor. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Timothy Webmoor. The network helps show where Timothy Webmoor may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 7 scholars most cited alongside Timothy Webmoor, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2008 | 144 | |
| 2 | 2012 | 118 | |
| 3 | 2007 | 88 | |
| 4 | 2011 | 39 | |
| 5 | 2012 | 32 | |
| 6 | 2005 | 23 | |
| 7 | 2008 | 14 | |
| 8 | 2014 | 13 | |
| 9 | Un giro más tras el “giro social”: el principio de la simetría en arqueología | 2007 | 3 |
| 10 | 2016 | 2 | |
| 11 | Are digital picturings representations? | 2010 | 1 |
| 12 | Arqueología neo-procesual: alive and kicking...What? Theorical camps, motivational attitudes and academic amnesia | 2009 | 0 |
About Timothy Webmoor
Timothy Webmoor is a scholar working on Anthropology, Paleontology, Space and Planetary Science, Museology and Communication, having authored 12 papers that have together received 477 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Anthropological Studies and Insights (3 papers), Archaeological Research and Protection (2 papers), Museums and Cultural Heritage (2 papers), Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (2 papers), Wikis in Education and Collaboration (1 paper), Archaeological and Historical Studies (1 paper), Urban and sociocultural dynamics (1 paper) and Visual Culture and Art Theory (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Archeology (60 citations), Space and Planetary Science (57 citations), Geography, Planning and Development (137 citations), Paleontology (165 citations) and Anthropology (199 citations). Timothy Webmoor has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Christopher Witmore, Bjørnar Olsen, Michael Shanks, Annamaria Carusi, Aud Sissel Hoel, Steve Woolgar and Gordana Vunjak‐Novakovic. Their work appears in journals such as Complutum, Visual Anthropology Review, World Archaeology, Information Communication & Society and Journal of Social Archaeology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.