Tim Treis
Impact in
- Ophthalmology top 10%
- Retinal Diseases and Treatments
- Retinal and Optic Conditions
- Glaucoma and retinal disorders
-
- Retinal Imaging and Analysis
Papers in
-
- Retinal Development and Disorders 4
- Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics 1
- Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks 1
- Gene expression and cancer classification 1
-
- Retinal Diseases and Treatments 5
- Retinal and Optic Conditions 3
- Ocular Diseases and Behçet’s Syndrome 1
- Co-authors
- Philipp L. Müller (6 shared papers)Maximilian Pfau (4 shared papers)Adnan Tufail (5 shared papers)Frank G. Holz (3 shared papers)Philipp Herrmann (3 shared papers)Alexandru Odainic (2 shared papers)Bart Liefers (1 shared paper)Konstantinos Balaskas (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Translational Vision Science & Technology (1 paper)Scientific Reports (1 paper)British Journal of Ophthalmology (1 paper)Journal of Clinical Medicine (1 paper)Bioinformatics (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Tim Treis
8 papers receiving 84 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 34
- Ophthalmology 50
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 42
- Health Informatics 1
- Clinical Biochemistry 4
- Molecular Biology 38
Countries citing papers authored by Tim Treis
This map shows the geographic impact of Tim Treis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tim Treis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tim Treis more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Tim Treis
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tim Treis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tim Treis. The network helps show where Tim Treis may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Tim Treis, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2021 | 19 | |
| 2 | 2020 | 15 | |
| 3 | 2020 | 15 | |
| 4 | 2023 | 14 | |
| 5 | 2020 | 10 | |
| 6 | 2021 | 8 | |
| 7 | 2021 | 2 | |
| 8 | 2024 | 1 |
About Tim Treis
Tim Treis is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Ophthalmology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Infectious Diseases and Genetics, having authored 8 papers that have together received 84 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Retinal Diseases and Treatments (5 papers), Retinal Imaging and Analysis (4 papers), Retinal Development and Disorders (4 papers), Retinal and Optic Conditions (3 papers), Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics (1 paper), Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks (1 paper), Ocular Diseases and Behçet’s Syndrome (1 paper) and Gene expression and cancer classification (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (50 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (42 citations), Health Informatics (1 citation), Clinical Biochemistry (4 citations) and Molecular Biology (38 citations). Tim Treis has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Philipp L. Müller, Maximilian Pfau, Adnan Tufail, Frank G. Holz, Philipp Herrmann, Alexandru Odainic, Bart Liefers, Konstantinos Balaskas, Peter M. Maloca and Narendra Dhingra. Their work appears in journals such as Translational Vision Science & Technology, Scientific Reports, British Journal of Ophthalmology, Journal of Clinical Medicine and Bioinformatics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.