Tim Schäfer

909 citations
47 papers · 716 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Tim Schäfer

44 papers receiving 712 citations

Peers

Tim Schäfer
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 565
  • Spectroscopy 159
  • Atmospheric Science 142
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 44
  • Catalysis 31
Replace G. Barratt Park with:
G. Barratt Park United States
Damian L. Kokkin United States
Qiyan Sun United States
Daniel Matsiev United States
Thomas D. Varberg United States
Nathalie Rougeau France
Ricardo Pérez de Tudela Spain
Neil J. Reilly United States
Dale J. Brugh United States
Jesús Rubayo‐Soneira Cuba
Tim Schäfer relative to G. Barratt Park United States G. Barratt Park's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
G. Barratt Park · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Tim Schäfer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tim Schäfer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tim Schäfer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tim Schäfer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tim Schäfer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tim Schäfer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tim Schäfer. The network helps show where Tim Schäfer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Tim Schäfer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Tim Schäfer Line = papers co-authored together Tim Schäfer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 47 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201555
2 201354
3 201746
4 201641
5 200940
6 201434
7 201433
8 200732
9 201529
10 201728
11 201027
12 201224
13 201321
14 202219
15 201217
16 200816
17 202415
18 201715
19 201115
20 201614

About Tim Schäfer

Tim Schäfer is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Spectroscopy, Materials Chemistry, Physical and Theoretical Chemistry and Atmospheric Science, having authored 47 papers that have together received 716 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (34 papers), Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (18 papers), Catalytic Processes in Materials Science (14 papers), Spectroscopy and Laser Applications (10 papers), Molecular Junctions and Nanostructures (7 papers), nanoparticles nucleation surface interactions (5 papers), Astro and Planetary Science (5 papers) and Photochemistry and Electron Transfer Studies (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (565 citations), Spectroscopy (159 citations), Atmospheric Science (142 citations), Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (44 citations) and Catalysis (31 citations). Tim Schäfer has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and China. Frequent co-authors include Alec M. Wodtke, Bastian C. Krüger, Nils Bartels, Daniel J. Auerbach, Alexander Kandratsenka, G. Barratt Park, Christof Bartels, Sven Meyer, Dirk Schwarzer and Kai Golibrzuch. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, The Journal of Chemical Physics, The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters, The Journal of Physical Chemistry C and Angewandte Chemie International Edition.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact